Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=cmpwn.com header.i=@cmpwn.com
Received: from out1.migadu.com (out1.migadu.com [91.121.223.63])
	by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 179C611EFF3
	for <~adnano/go-gemini-devel@lists.sr.ht>; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:58:06 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cmpwn.com; s=key1;
	t=1613915885;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=6b6b2MxUAppFm395zANBVooas6XvhpdJ2RJpUd4gEVE=;
	b=abb/7Dm20P88jL17nhJfE9XnoVWn6uKj3NhSD/BPsqBbV7QrdUY1dmk/pDX/5wrU+C6GPR
	NomdY+vnpIlb35tOnbOmTqgiQg6iim0uvLJzB3nCiaIV0nBwi8roVCOSP+Tk4KbNTax7aM
	bcWlzkyD4USDY+7xPbwBxTOoM6WGe9We9KZ5zqjsm+wPdo2KT67uijcsN1Rh2mZazVwDLA
	Lq0dun+q9aCWwd9Mob/CIFDkpr5b0ESDHf76hQ0GgqRnLxp63EFOL0ypums5jGJ0JzrXUJ
	BvHE5mJJvm9p6pz1iMu0Mnt7JOl6l0B/OsXG9w/SCSojB2oHdKrc7SAgN+7KlA==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 08:58:02 -0500
Message-Id: <C9F9FL0VJ49K.I7N3GT2NU82J@taiga>
X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers.
From: "Drew DeVault" <sir@cmpwn.com>
To: "Adnan Maolood" <me@adnano.co>, <~adnano/go-gemini-devel@lists.sr.ht>
Cc: <hugo@wetterberg.nu>
Subject: Re: Seeking feedback for version v0.1.15
References: <C9F92JK69JJ7.9EHPJB5FIYNK@taiga>
 <C9F95QSF7ERT.3FKWA5DJDO5XJ@nitro>
In-Reply-To: <C9F95QSF7ERT.3FKWA5DJDO5XJ@nitro>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT
X-Migadu-Auth-User: sir@cmpwn.com

On Sun Feb 21, 2021 at 8:45 AM EST, Adnan Maolood wrote:
> I could, however this makes creating derivative contexts more
> difficult.  One must call Request.Context(), and then call
> Request.WithContext with the derived context, which must copy the
> request. Also note that the http Handler API was in use before the
> introduction of contexts, so they had to implement that API for
> backwards compatibility. Since we don't have to worry about that yet,
> I think we can come up with a better approach.

That's a good point. Yours is probably the better design. I don't really
mind having a context parameter in function signatures.