Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30F9C11F2D7 for <~bzg/woof@lists.sr.ht>; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDN1W-0007gA-Qe; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 04:58:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=v/l8t+ca7ErCo/r6ggxplDQ4zW1aBWyPSWRuBOYFpsw=; b=ck7ZCCo0eHN2vUCLU9pv CZ9tsGvHsWfnYHdgFswVaeL3RulBzOohAyPSLQDAVn9B+zVaz2Tz8PUKHxV4qJNdjJxac/nr25wEg dPWTlV9XjK+Ax1MgnoLGgk26TVEgGYKtMt/rpzPrfXSEKfRu27Kap0FBYyvAu0ftOhNg1YzawnZMZ 6JRBT3ido26DOxeyPlYZh8PJRoIVywSj8IcCzWpmHBKz13qB7Y3EepfBeq81TSsINu5DERaU1Nq+v wj2c3F6xJuwABZHXK0X3KI5yX/2ia6/itB7XVwH34Sqzgd1jMU9DYm+n78lGuzCs50PeF+dUz08YP TweiJjh71PCyew==; Received: from [185.24.184.132] (helo=hal) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDN1W-0004LF-3r; Thu, 05 Jan 2023 04:58:58 -0500 Received: by hal (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0AE891E0408; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 10:58:56 +0100 (CET) From: Bastien To: Ihor Radchenko Cc: ~bzg/woof@lists.sr.ht Subject: [RFE] Re: [BUG] Vote counting for requests In-Reply-To: <87cz7tgwaz.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Thu, 05 Jan 2023 09:33:40 +0000") Organization: GNU References: <87cz7tgwaz.fsf@localhost> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 10:58:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87eds9480v.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Definitely not a bug, probably a request for enhancement (RFE). Ihor Radchenko writes: > What does 0/2 refer to? It means "0 persons in favor vs. 2 persons in favor". > Among the 3 emails in the thread, you wrote "A strong +1", which is > clearly not counted for. Votes are like other triggers: they start at the beginning of a line. > Then, Tim replied not voting at all (neither +1 > nor -1 are in his message, except the quote). Such messages don't change the vote at all. - +1 would change 0/2 to 1/3 - -1 would change 0/2 to 0/3 > Should votes field instead display +X/-X only displaying actual > counted votes? I'm not sure this is really more intuitive. 0/10 clearly says: nobody on ten votes want this. 5/10 clearly says: half voters want it, half voters don't. 1/10 clearly says: only one expressed vote want it. So the poll would be: do you prefer -2/+3 over 3/5? -- Bastien