Recent activity

Re: Tagging an existing public repo 5 days ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss


On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, at 22:40, Drew DeVault wrote:
> On Wed Jun 16, 2021 at 4:39 PM EDT, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Indeed. This is making more sense now. Then my question really becomes
> > one of understanding whether it's possible to move or integrate existing
> > repositories in a new project?
> 
> Yes, this is possible. It should be apparent when you go to add a repo
> to your new project.
> 
Got it - it's all working as intended now. Thank you.

Best,

Re: Tagging an existing public repo 5 days ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Hello Drew,

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, at 22:28, Drew DeVault wrote:
> You're probably mixing up repositories with projects. You can create a
> project here:
> 
> https://sr.ht/projects/create
> 

Indeed. This is making more sense now. Then my question really becomes one of understanding whether it's possible to move or integrate existing repositories in a new project?

Thank you,

Charles.

Tagging an existing public repo 5 days ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Hello,

I must truly be an idiot but I do not see how I can tag an existing public repo so that it can be listed in the lists of public projects. Not that my dot files are the best stuff since sliced bread but I'm wondering what I'm not doing to have them listed.

Thanks,

Charles-H. Schulz.

Re: Didn't get notice for ToS change 2 months ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss


On Sat, Apr 3, 2021, at 17:13, Tanguy Fardet wrote:
> On 03/04/2021 16:59, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Sat, Apr 3, 2021, at 16:50, Smit wrote:
> >> The sr.ht terms of service (https://man.sr.ht/terms.md) say:
> >>
> >>> We may make changes to these terms with no less than 2 weeks notice.
> >>> Notice of changes to these terms will be sent to the email on file for
> >>> your account.
> >>
> >> ...but I didn't get any email about the change that was made yesterday.

Re: Didn't get notice for ToS change 2 months ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Hello,

On Sat, Apr 3, 2021, at 16:50, Smit wrote:
> The sr.ht terms of service (https://man.sr.ht/terms.md) say:
> 
> > We may make changes to these terms with no less than 2 weeks notice. 
> > Notice of changes to these terms will be sent to the email on file for 
> > your account.
> 
> ...but I didn't get any email about the change that was made yesterday. 
> It seems no notice of any kind was given about this change:
> 
> https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-docs/commit/e14c2d61685112fb82beb1c085095b9bf869a716
> 

Re: Is there any interest in sr.ht merchandise? 3 months ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Drew DeVault @ 2021-03-15 22:16 CET:

> I would naturally make an effort to use quality materials. I would only
> do it if it was stuff that I'd buy for myself. I would be happy to hear
> from the Document Foundation folks, Charles, can you put me in touch?

I'm happy to do that. I'll ping you off list in the next days.

All the best,
-- 
Charles-H. Schulz
Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards 
http://www.standardsandfreedom.net

Re: Is there any interest in sr.ht merchandise? 3 months ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Hello there,

Chris Höppner @ 2021-03-15 21:39 CET:

> El March 15, 2021 5:10:24 PM UTC, Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> escribió:
>>Every now and then someone expresses interest in obtaining sr.ht
>>merchandise - stuff like stickers, T-shirts, coffee mug, etc. It would
>>be fairly easy to set such a thing up - there are several companies
>>that
>>provide mostly hands-off online merchandise stores these days.
>>
>>If you're interested, reply to this thread, or just click this URL:
>>
>>https://drewdevault.com/merch-interest.txt

Re: Matrix instead of IRC? 7 months ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Hello,

Bastien @ 2020-11-11 16:15 CET:

> FWIW, you can use matrix.org and vector.im as an IRC client:
> https://gist.github.com/fstab/ce805d3001600ac147b79d413668770d
>
> You may find more recent documentation on the web.

Indeed. May I ask the OP what specific features he's seeing in the Matrix
protocol he cannot find with IRC? It seems to me he is mostly putting forward
UI elements and UX. There are many interfaces and clients for IRC, some of
which are web-based with modern interfaces. Also, the Mattermost client can
propose a modern experience while acting as a bridge with IRC channels and

Re: Adding mu/mu4e to the list of plain text email clients 1 year, 4 months ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/public-inbox

On Sat, Feb 15, 2020, at 23:21, Drew DeVault wrote:
> No, I'm talking about hard-wrapping lines. As I understand, something
> along the following lines is required:
> 
> (add-hook 'message-mode-hook 'auto-fill-mode)
>
I'm still not sure why that disqualifies mu4e to be listed among the site's recommendations. As I understand it "your mileage may vary" in this particular case and is easily fixable: https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/aakmz4/line_breaks_in_emails_mu4e/

All the best,

Charles.

Re: Adding mu/mu4e to the list of plain text email clients 1 year, 4 months ago

From Charles-H. Schulz to ~sircmpwn/public-inbox

Hello Drew,

Drew DeVault @ 2020-02-15 18:18 CET:

> The issue which was preventing mu4e from being added to the list of
> recommended clients was that it doesn't do the right thing _by default_.
> If I recall correctly, a configuration option is needed to configure
> text wrapping.

Are you referring to the format-flowed behaviour as explained here[1]?
If that's the case I think we're still in the realm of pure plain text
emails.

[1] See section 16:  https://www.djcbsoftware.nl/code/mu/mu4e/Writing-messages.html#Writing-messages