~clockwork_coder

Recent activity

Re: The styleset patch has been reverted 2 months ago

From Alex to ~sircmpwn/aerc

For what it's worth, I got it working on my system, with no knowledge of Go (copied the templates and sample config), and thought that this update looked great.

On Thu, 28 May 2020, at 3:35 PM, Drew DeVault wrote:
> This patch wrecked my install and provied no clear path to a fix.

Re: [PATCH] fix binding for delete message 3 months ago

From Alex to ~sircmpwn/aerc

I had noticed that previously, but...

I might be on my own here, but I never managed to get that working, even
with "prompt".  I get the error (with either ":delete" or
":delete-message":

"Unknown command delete-message" or "Unknown command delete"

I'm on the latest version of aerc.

Thanks,

Alex

Re: [PATCH] WIP: Add Style configuration 6 months ago

From Alex Stevenson to ~sircmpwn/aerc

>Along these lines of thought:
>
>[style]
>unread.fg=...
>unread.bg=...
>unread.bold=true
># ...
>
>This is what I had been thinking of originally.

Would that still allow, for example, unread + flagged messages to be a
specific colour?  Or recipient to be a different colour?

Wondering if it's feasible to have hierarchical settings, like:

Re: [PATCH] WIP: Add Style configuration 6 months ago

From Alex Stevenson to ~sircmpwn/aerc

>Now, if we have the above but do that conditionally you end up with a gazillion
>different sections.
>
>I'd rather have a single [style] section that can be overridden by other, more
>specific sections like [style:subject~regex] and the likes.

I like the idea of regex to customise colours.  To mention Mutt again, I
use that to highlight emails from certain recipients or containing
specific subjects, which is really helpful.

Any colour configuration would be welcome though... this the main
feature I've been waiting for before attempting to migrate off Mutt.

Alex