~cnx

Ulsan, South Korea

https://cnx.srht.site

Vietnamese free software enthusiast

Join the FSF

~cnx/misc

Last active a day ago

~cnx/loang

Last active 3 days ago

~cnx/ipwhl-announce

Last active 9 days ago

~cnx/ipwhl-devel

Last active 18 days ago

~cnx/ipwhl-discuss

Last active a month ago

~cnx/blackshades

Last active 2 months ago

~cnx/site

Last active 5 months ago

~cnx/tzigame

Last active 8 months ago

~cnx/palace

Last active 10 months ago

~cnx/nwsim

Last active 1 year, 2 months ago
View more

Recent activity

Re: [PATCH] Set viewport for the site a day ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~cnx/misc

Thanks!

To git.sr.ht:~cnx/phylactery
   372c235cb608..cd0c0b5aee48 main -> main

Re: Problems posting patches to lists.sr.ht 2 days ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

On Fri Jul 1, 2022 at 11:10 AM +0200, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
> Happy to report that a fix has been rolled out and we ran a query
> to fix the database. Both reported threads now look as expected.

Thanks!  BTW the count over https://lists.sr.ht/~cnx/blackshades
still does not reflect the number if displayed threads.
Is it just caching or another issue to be ironed out?

loang.net is down 3 days ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~cnx/loang

TIFU: for some reason, nix rebuild failed to start up services
so everything was down.  Rollback was stuck so I cancelled
and restore a backup, but it's taking indefinitely.

I am so sorry for the inconvenience.  The Matrix server is down
and the room doesn't have other public alias so I'm posting it here.

~cnx

Re: Problems posting patches to lists.sr.ht 5 days ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

On Fri Jun 24, 2022 at 7:11 PM +0200, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
> Quick update on this: we've identified one problem with thread 
> assignment where mails arrive out of order. [...] This is definitely
> what happened with the Blackshades thread.

May I ask which order it is?  I want to resort the mbox
and test around a little.

> I'll keep you posted.

Thanks!

Re: [lists.sr.ht/patches] build success 5 days ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev

> -    body = urlize(msg.body, rel="noopener nofollow")
> +    body = urlize(msg.body, rel="noopener nofollow", extra_schemes=["gemini", "irc", "ircs"])

Should this be in sync with core.sr.ht?
https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/core.sr.ht/tree/744c3cf6/item/srht/markdown.py#L187-198

Re: Not include myself in reply-all from Sent folder? 12 days ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~rjarry/aerc-discuss

On Wed Jun 22, 2022 at 2:17 PM +0000, DJ Chase wrote:
> Set reply-to-self to false in the [compose] section of aerc.conf.

Thanks!  I'm embarrassed to admit I did not RTFM (-;

Re: Not include myself in reply-all from Sent folder? 12 days ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~rjarry/aerc-discuss

As an user, I consider the current behavior to be a bug.  Not once
when I reply to my own message I want to actually send myself a copy.

Re: Limits in git? 13 days ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

On Tue Jun 21, 2022 at 7:44 PM CEST, Xavier B. wrote:
> In this repo, I store several videos and images in order to teach
> my classes.  I use "Fair use" and other copyright exceptions in order
> to use copyrighted material, which is only for pose questions and
> reflections to my students.

I can offer you access to a public VPS (loang.net) if you don't have
a server to store those files already.  You can rsync the files there
and I can expose them via nginx (we also have IPFS but I suppose
the files are only to be stored for a few months so they prolly
don't worth the overhead).

Re: Problems posting patches to lists.sr.ht 13 days ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

On Mon Jun 20, 2022 at 9:47 PM +0200, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> Another funny detail: It's included in the mbox export:
> https://lists.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc-devel/%3C20220620082222.196328-1-moritz%40poldrack.dev%3E/mbox

FWIW it's not limited to patches, I posted this in sr.ht-dev
two months ago <CCJJWBWPYJRHH.P27EGATOLHJR@nix> and no one
seemed to know why either.

On Tue Apr 26, 2022 at 1:45 PM KST, Nguyễn Gia Phong wrote:
> Case in point: [0] vs [1].  This message is also available
> in the archive at [2].  I wonder if this has been reported before
> and if I should file a ticket for it.
>
> [0] https://lists.sr.ht/~cnx/blackshades/<e4f806dc-96b6-403d-92c4-bf534834e3a2@icculus.org>/raw

Re: [PATCH ipwhl-data 6/6] fastapi: init at 0.78.0 18 days ago

From Nguyễn Gia Phong to ~cnx/ipwhl-devel

Thanks!

To git.sr.ht:~cnx/ipwhl-data
   3b288ea9a3a9..463d5e421a9f  main -> main