~dmbaturin/soupault

4 3

The Website is not responding.

Details
Message ID
<5c63f8bec99a71e723e3225cd1e58cd9@aoirthoir.com>
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Is it just a temporary glitch on soupault.app?

---
Aoirthoir An Broc
Details
Message ID
<1B269DD6-811F-4258-A9B6-98B988B37183@posteo.net>
In-Reply-To
<5c63f8bec99a71e723e3225cd1e58cd9@aoirthoir.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Quad9 isn’t resolving the domain.

$ nslookup soupault.app 9.9.9.9

Are you using their DNS too? My current workaround is cloning the repo and reading its lightweight markup docs/manuals as needed.

dmbaturin, if this is the case, you'll wanna hit up Quad9’s contact form and ask to get unbanned.
-- 
toastal ไข่ดาว | https://toast.al
PGP: 7944 74b7 d236 dab9 c9ef  e7f9 5cce 6f14 66d4 7c9e
Details
Message ID
<bdba3dc06fe74273863d721c0d5313e9@aoirthoir.com>
In-Reply-To
<1B269DD6-811F-4258-A9B6-98B988B37183@posteo.net> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
I received the same results. But when
I went to my cellphone and switched it to
data the site showed up. A friend also
said it is working fine for her.

So i will figure out how to view it on my
laptops at some point. eventually talk to
our home internet provider.
---
Aoirthoir An Broc
The Trickster G-ds,
The G-ds oph Mischiephs.

On 2023-06-21 23:38, toastal wrote:
> Quad9 isn’t resolving the domain.
> 
> $ nslookup soupault.app 9.9.9.9
> 
> Are you using their DNS too? My current workaround is cloning the repo
> and reading its lightweight markup docs/manuals as needed.
> 
> dmbaturin, if this is the case, you'll wanna hit up Quad9’s contact
> form and ask to get unbanned.
Details
Message ID
<139cc168-985a-5213-d429-5e399e5a0302@baturin.org>
In-Reply-To
<bdba3dc06fe74273863d721c0d5313e9@aoirthoir.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Hi Aoirthoir and toastal,

That Quod9 stuff is a complete surprise to me.
It looks like the ban is spreading — it worked with 8.8.8.8 yesterday 
but today it doesn't.

I've registered soupault.net in case it's the .app domain that caused 
the problem.
There's a backlash against those Google domains that resemble 
commonly-used file extensions (.app, .mov, and now .zip)
because malicious actors often use them to create deceptive links.

However, I'm going to wait for a response from Quad9 before setting up 
A/AAAA records
and pointing the website to the new domain, just in case the current ban 
of soupault.app will spread to the new domain as well.

Meanwhile, you can access the website by its Netlify address where it's 
hosted: https://soupault.netlify.app/

Thanks for reporting the issue!

On 6/22/23 05:13, aoirthoir@aoirthoir.com wrote:
> I received the same results. But when
> I went to my cellphone and switched it to
> data the site showed up. A friend also
> said it is working fine for her.
>
> So i will figure out how to view it on my
> laptops at some point. eventually talk to
> our home internet provider.
> ---
> Aoirthoir An Broc
> The Trickster G-ds,
> The G-ds oph Mischiephs.
>
> On 2023-06-21 23:38, toastal wrote:
>> Quad9 isn’t resolving the domain.
>>
>> $ nslookup soupault.app 9.9.9.9
>>
>> Are you using their DNS too? My current workaround is cloning the repo
>> and reading its lightweight markup docs/manuals as needed.
>>
>> dmbaturin, if this is the case, you'll wanna hit up Quad9’s contact
>> form and ask to get unbanned.
Details
Message ID
<9b32157c-8866-86d8-9b82-9d5d458a009f@baturin.org>
In-Reply-To
<bdba3dc06fe74273863d721c0d5313e9@aoirthoir.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Ok, I think I know where the root cause lies. Here's a copy of the 
investigation notes that I sent to Quod9 in my blocklist removal request.

Dear Quod9 team,

soupault.app., the domain of my project, recently got blocked. I 
appreciate your effort to keep the users safe, but in this case it's a 
false positive.

You can view the website on Netlify: https://soupault.netlify.app
It's an open-source project with a four year history of releases: 
https://github.com/PataphysicalSociety/soupault — a static site 
generator framework that is based on HTML element tree rewriting (as 
opposed to Jekyll or Hugo that treat HTML as an opaque format).

I suppose one reason for the block may be that one antivirus software 
vendor (BitDefender) flagged the Linux executable of the latest release 
as malware.
This report shows that BitDefender thinks it's infected with Mirai: 
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/e044a7a309e38516e536799d7e869a00ade637ca4079764bf8aeb1620c72f652/detection

However, no other vendor detects anything wrong there, and macOS and 
Windows executables that are built from the same source code and the 
same third-party libraries don't raise any alarms.

* Windows: 
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/0883e2e7d844cfc71f82ea87466908f40f401927b3236a01248f9f65415d8eef/detection
* macOS: 
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/b0777f5c940a28da2994f643d5eaad230cbbc4262a063183f2b1426983704abc/detection

I also checked the executable to rule out a possibly supply chain attack 
through a third-party library. My checks with strings, objdump, and 
strace show that it doesn't contain any data (like command and control 
server addresses) and doesn't make any system calls I don't expect it to 
make.
In fact, it doesn't make any network connections at all — as it should, 
being a static site generator. Actual Mirai samples I could find use 
"wget <c&c server> | sh" to get the payload, and they are detected by 
multiple vendors.
(Of course, I didn't intentionally include any malicious code in the 
project. Since it's open-source, everyone is free to confirm that.)

Finally, re-compiling the executable with GNU libc instead of musl makes 
it pass the BitDefender check, and checking the musl library file from 
the package I use (musl-libc-static-1.2.3-2.fc37.x86_64) also doesn't 
raise any alarms.

If you need the file in question to forward to the threat intelligence 
provider, you can get it from 
https://github.com/PataphysicalSociety/soupault/releases/download/4.6.0/soupault-4.6.0-linux-x86_64.tar.gz

Thanks in advance,
Daniil

On 6/22/23 05:13, aoirthoir@aoirthoir.com wrote:
> I received the same results. But when
> I went to my cellphone and switched it to
> data the site showed up. A friend also
> said it is working fine for her.
>
> So i will figure out how to view it on my
> laptops at some point. eventually talk to
> our home internet provider.
> ---
> Aoirthoir An Broc
> The Trickster G-ds,
> The G-ds oph Mischiephs.
>
> On 2023-06-21 23:38, toastal wrote:
>> Quad9 isn’t resolving the domain.
>>
>> $ nslookup soupault.app 9.9.9.9
>>
>> Are you using their DNS too? My current workaround is cloning the repo
>> and reading its lightweight markup docs/manuals as needed.
>>
>> dmbaturin, if this is the case, you'll wanna hit up Quad9’s contact
>> form and ask to get unbanned.
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)