Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch (mail-40132.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.132])
	by mail.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B2E400BE
	for <~emersion/mrsh-dev@lists.sr.ht>; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 20:50:31 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.sr.ht;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=emersion.fr header.i=@emersion.fr header.b=HJa786l/
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 20:50:09 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emersion.fr;
	s=protonmail; t=1548708612;
	bh=lud5bgEDbrMiyazJysXqPI274QXPrHdIqNRcbcHI3Ko=;
	h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:
	 Feedback-ID:From;
	b=HJa786l/2c4sMqMpqsAFy9lMVVd0R1nS5yj/D3A1EWUIt6l6BFkJLlHpHyUeHpQCp
	 DwQb6RA2PXfCEMQWjqgdsf5XdwVgfJtq3aeC50OsSAJo1JFTGhn9K77roQYvUDS1P0
	 sqG75dPzwm3I2MAQjYFEmHo18e/TRU6JfJLxhEE0=
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cristian_Adri=C3=A1n_Ontivero?= <cristianontivero@gmail.com>
From: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Cc: "~emersion/mrsh-dev@lists.sr.ht" <~emersion/mrsh-dev@lists.sr.ht>
Reply-To: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Parse arithmetic expressions with shifts
Message-ID: <Zh2ZvpHXdKekPe69u6rJWuchJnUzUolJhF4IfzIjZIZFviCQd22c1VGgmSbyKI3FkiZChevzpiIF0SlmeLq5ODLWUeP6-FUHK7ie8zV6S8s=@emersion.fr>
In-Reply-To: <U7ts9Yh_Z3XOiaWl6AhxSN67-FxIMtbaYeTlvyyyw5DQAS4ikfnS4TYaWhLzU3L__Qchoi8zRWD-ikFm8bmHtmYtoDUqVmfVKpSKHCpQSn0=@emersion.fr>
References: <20190125085755.5290-1-cristianontivero@gmail.com>
 <U7ts9Yh_Z3XOiaWl6AhxSN67-FxIMtbaYeTlvyyyw5DQAS4ikfnS4TYaWhLzU3L__Qchoi8zRWD-ikFm8bmHtmYtoDUqVmfVKpSKHCpQSn0=@emersion.fr>
Feedback-ID: FsVprHBOgyvh0T8bxcZ0CmvJCosWkwVUg658e_lOUQMnA9qynD8O1lGeniuBDfPSkDAUuhiKfOIXUZBfarMyvA==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.protonmail.ch

On Monday, January 28, 2019 9:48 PM, Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> wrote:
> Nitpick: the convention I've used so far is to use the`_func` prefix
> for function types.

I mean suffix, not prefix (thanks Drew!).