Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=hacktheplanet.fi header.i=@hacktheplanet.fi Received: from mail.hacktheplanet.fi (mail.hacktheplanet.fi [95.216.157.116]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6109011EFCE for <~emersion/public-inbox@lists.sr.ht>; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:58:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=gibson; bh=QNnCo7EHaTBYx dYKKeP3HTpIXO7EWkMTFRVnw/qPw2I=; h=in-reply-to:references:subject:cc: to:from:date; d=hacktheplanet.fi; b=rhya8zMwl0vjIfm4VIhqECAqOibo7QTyy8 /QcCbmcN4NfwUDIsBX2NBpwAxl2cmIqf8s6mecSGldqB2HHnJ+SW/fqg8TY4iTy9IlYH+L 4MUtCtTIKEYcCZKo0p/X6oKBehBuG/mfe7ytJb+ylDDgJ37MzqDeLdcgRxfagtrq2b7nAy SNpLZvZtVbaY5Xfaa7/he8HbBG/rRZWxIZYVWfCN5FPFQeTc+fxPfKofvPh9zCJDhn6Lc7 BYGeTKF/dgucwXtqOI6p3ltFV0mAh/pNa8gTAVXwwtKUpiwwB+hHWX2hdSASlfPp3p55Vg /0gp2sYIBgOBwPVJuKOnlpfQSCxw== Received: from gutsman.lotheac.fi (1-21-49-31.east.dxpn.ucom.ne.jp [1.21.49.31]) by mail.hacktheplanet.fi (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7b572c4e (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (gutsman.lotheac.fi [local]) by gutsman.lotheac.fi (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 905fc57f; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:58:35 +0900 From: Lauri Tirkkonen To: Simon Ser Cc: ~emersion/public-inbox@lists.sr.ht Subject: Re: [PATCH gamja] add TLS checkbox to network form Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Thanks for your response. On Mon, Jan 16 2023 10:52:52 +0000, Simon Ser wrote: > Hm, thanks for the patch, but I'm not sure this is something I want to > support. I'd prefer to force users who want insecure connections to use > BouncerServ manually. Insecure connections are best avoided. Sure. It's just that there are some IRC networks out there that either don't support TLS connections at all (QuakeNet, I think), or only a small minority of servers do (IRCnet); I wanted my users to have an easier experience with those. That said, the patch does change behavior for irc:// links - I could be persuaded into requiring irc+insecure:// for insecure links instead, if that's more reasonable to you. -- Lauri Tirkkonen | lotheac @ IRCnet