https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Enterprisey
From Enterprisey to ~emersion/soju-dev
Hexchat truncates passwords, so add a warning about that and a workaround for Sourcehut users. --- contrib/clients.md | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/contrib/clients.md b/contrib/clients.md index a35c3dc..2ac5fff 100644 --- a/contrib/clients.md +++ b/contrib/clients.md @@ -71,6 +71,12 @@ outgoing messages: /set irc_reconnect_rejoin off /set net_throttle off [message trimmed]
From Enterprisey to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:21:18 +0200 "Ivan Habunek" <ivan@habunek.com> wrote: > I actually have a WIP patch for sorting, could finish it up. Yeah, that would be cool - or if you wanted to send it to me or otherwise put it up somewhere, that would be nice too. Just today I found myself wishing again that we could sort by oldest first.
From Enterprisey to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:35:00 -0300 Pedro Lucas Porcellis <porcellis@eletrotupi.com> wrote: > I would suggest something like `comments:desc` or `comments:asc`. Even > though it's more verbose but I see as more simple to understand what > output you will get. I like the syntax, and it's terse, which is great, but we might want to do `comments:>=2020-08-28` or `created:yesterday` at some point (and have those be applied at the same time as some sort order), and "one meaning per key (part before colon)" seems to be a desirable property for me. I'm fine with either of comments/-comments, comments/comments_asc, or comments_desc/comments_asc.
From Enterprisey to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
I'd like todo.sr.ht's search to handle order:updated and order:comments (i.e. sort by number of comments, most to least). I wonder what syntax to use for reversing the order, and what other sort orders to offer. Other approaches I saw for reversing the order: - GitHub: sort:comments-asc, sort:comments-desc - GitLab, Gitea: sorting gets its own dropdown menu separate from the search field - Some image boards: order:comments sorts most to least, order:comments_asc sorts least to most. Or sometimes order:comments_desc sorts most to least instead. I also briefly considered !order:foo, but it's slightly inconsistent