Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.141])
	by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3440DFF120
	for <~gpanders/passage@lists.sr.ht>; Wed,  2 Dec 2020 16:50:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
	by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E78D6160214
	for <~gpanders/passage@lists.sr.ht>; Wed,  2 Dec 2020 17:50:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CmQ1l1ZKFz6tmH;
	Wed,  2 Dec 2020 17:50:03 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 17:50:02 +0100
Message-Id: <C7IGD5IK6BZS.GSQWGHJJQH5F@desktop-pc>
From: "Robin Opletal" <me@robinopletal.com>
To: "Gregory Anders" <greg@gpanders.com>
Cc: <~gpanders/passage@lists.sr.ht>
Subject: Re: Motivation for the project
References: <C7IC3WOFWGDY.21YWZPD23MGFI@desktop-pc>
 <X8e5E3zzXngB1EnG@s1034043>
In-Reply-To: <X8e5E3zzXngB1EnG@s1034043>

> but pass was often taking between 1.5-2 seconds to retrieve a single pass=
word.

Thanks - I am not experiencing that big of a lag, I would say retrieving a
password and copying it to the clipboard takes 0.08s with an unlocked
keyring. Improvements are always welcome though - I was just curious :)