Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch (mail-40137.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.137]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5936311EF2C for <~gpcf/advtrains-discuss@lists.sr.ht>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:02:46 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1671206578; x=1671465778; bh=QM/kLGaIYJC1uTGHOphmTYwvcYFHs9EfoMwN/bcpZWs=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=ZK46LqGXYjquiowie6XqoHlb+PmvPnyO6YMeGVMx86auFJQlUNkzQhfCcN9QRHaQ3 4imskqHvVqDoP293treeb8P7ZMst3uZFt9oHYS1B7YLFxN2GzAiauWQPOO5JECYt5C sl7NkKabIlm/pJJqwCFXNZwKH/r9GgZ4uoDX1Ei5+PtqW/doOB0SEHXi5Np9nKl/lW 3RoaVTyRBdoBQT+B/FYTwj4NUTp8Q/tF/2n84dCRqYg3HShgoCmy9HHzD5xf3D1hZK VtjFKkDNB8P0tccDZ/2wMIHbb2zacGY8kkRyDppi0/jW/ftjsDeu/VsuTg+M9qxCYR ZHsbBBCDdMsaQ== To: "Y. Wang" From: 56independent <56independent@protonmail.com> Cc: ~gpcf/advtrains-discuss@lists.sr.ht Subject: Re: train.door_open documentation where? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Feedback-ID: 34326020:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > The search box has a dropdown beside it that says "log msg" by default, > so I am not sure why you are surprised about this. I did use it, but even the one most likely, "range" seems to search commits. https://git.bananach.space/advtrains.git/log/?qt=3Drange&q=3Ddoor > You can't, until it is implemented. >=20 > Orwell wrote that "Advtrains has the functions and tools required to > implement the position lookups you describe", not wagon-specific door > status. Oh, ok, i guess my reading skills aren't that great anymore because i have stopped using English as much as i used to. > Considering that, on the same discussion page, you mentioned "[a] simple > addition to an ATC command" to add door indices, I suppose it should be > "simple" enough to figure out where and how to implement it. Ok, you got me. I'm at home right now and i'll add the "simple addition" soon.