Hi Rek2,

First of all, thanks for using gssg! Good to see people using :)

On 4/2/22 03:12, rek2@hispagatos.org wrote:
> Hello, will it be possible to add http support?
> I know, I know this may sound silly, but I am a solely gemini blogger,
> and since sr.ht supports both I decided what if I can run gssg and also
> create optionally the http pages so I can enable that feature with out
> having to switch to a bloated HUGO that does not do gemini.
While I developed gssg as being a gemini-only solution, it's certainly 
possible to add HTML support. But I think we should add it in a way that 
does not impact the overall gemini usage, a optional config.toml 
section, perhaps.

On 12/17/21 14:17, Christoph Hentschel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm using Linux Mint and I want to use gssg. But it isn't in apt or I can compile it. My simple (and stupid) question is how can I use gssg?
> 
> Best regards, Christoph

Hi there, I usually just compile it by hand by running "make" and "sudo 
make install". You can just run "make" and use the compiled "./gssg" in 
the repo directly if you don't want to install it :)

More info in the repo page https://git.sr.ht/~gsthnz/gssg#usage

Since I don't use apt-based distros I never had the time to actually

On 8/31/21 9:26 AM, Frank Homburg wrote:
> Hello Gustavo Heinz,
> 
> I'm looking for a clean Hugo theme like the one you are using at https://gsthnz.com.
> 
> Would you please so kind and tell me which one you are using?
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Frank
> 

Hi there,

Hello there,

Due to a backup error, I had to regenerate the SSL certificate for
cyberpunksin.space.

The new SSL fingerprint is:

SHA1 Fingerprint=B0:4D:FE:61:DB:E0:93:CE:8B:C4:A2:1D:21:E9:A5:47:9B:40:9F:8D

Most gemini clients will show a warning informing that the SSL
certificate changed.

--
Gustavo Heinz

Hi!

On Sun Apr 11, 2021 at 2:45 AM -03, ybaumy wrote:
> Yes I meant gssg. Sorry. I am new at sr.ht and I guess this list is for
> more projects.
It's ok :)

> I am preparing to migrate my current homepage
> https://lost-frequencies.eu to gemini. There is already a
> https:/gemini.lost-frequencies.eu site and with it a
> gemini://gemini.lost-frequencies.eu site. My current homepage is pretty
> much my article reading history and has a folder structure for
> year/month/day. I can script this myself and add index.gmi files for
> each folder and dynamically build a new top index.gmi each time a new

Hi there,

On Sat Apr 10, 2021 at 5:10 PM -03, ybaumy wrote:
> Would it possible to add support for subfolders on the index page and
> generate an index for each folder automatically?
>
> BR
>
> ybaumy

I assume you're talking about gssg.

gssg does not create files, the implementation becomes much simpler
without it.

Hi Michael,

Sorry for the delay,

On Sun Mar 28, 2021 at 3:29 AM -03, Michael Bryant wrote:
> I like having "prettified" URLs, e.g. `example.com/foo/` instead of
> `example.com/foo.gmi`.
> To try to achieve that, all of my content is in `page-slug/index.gmi`,
> but this does not
> seem to play well with the templates -- no posts list is generated.

> It's possible that the problem is just that I have a `/posts/index.gmi`
> that is taking
> precedence, but, reading the README, I think that may not be it, since

Hi there, thanks for another patch!

I have one suggestion.

Could you make logging configurable and inactive by default? It should
be just the case of adding a "Logging" entry to the Config struct and
accepting "off" and "nginx" (Not sure if we use "nginx" or "clf" from
Common Logging Format, your choice :p). This would allow us to add more
logging templates in the future.

I was reading through the gemini mailing list and it doesn't seem to be
a consensus if logging is needed/required. So we should keep this as a
decision for the server admin. Since keeping logs could be a liability
for some.

On Wed Mar 3, 2021 at 11:10 AM -03, Eric Bower wrote:
> Confirmed it is required on linux. Would you be receptive to a patch and
> describes how to get docker to work on mac?

Yes, that would be cool! Did you need to modify the Dockerfile, or just
not doing the chown/chmod made it work on OSX?

If we could run on OSX without having to manually modify the Dockerfile,
that would be super cool.

> Also, how necessary do you see setting the user at all? I use docker
> quite a bit and haven’t really seen this paradigm much before.

On Linux, docker usually runs as root, and by default, the CMD will run

Hi there,

On Wed Mar 3, 2021 at 12:27 AM -03, Eric Bower wrote:
> I'm wondering if it is required on some other OS or if I'm missing
> something obvious. 

It's for linux usage, a "satellite" user was created inside the
container with UID 1000 to isolate the daemon.

On OSX, things work a bit diferently, since there's a virtual machine
running linux that actually runs the docker daemon, the volume sharing
has a few more steps compared to native linux.

As a OSX specific workaround, you could remove the "RUN adduser..." part