From Łukasz Niemier to ~sircmpwn/public-inbox
When looking through the RFCs I have found XDR[1] format which is quite similar to the BARE with few differences: - less integer types - only 32-bit and 64-bit - no maps - no optionals (can be implemented via unions) - more C-like description language rather than Go-like - is big-endian - variable length entries must be padded with zeros up to 4 bytes [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4506 -- Łukasz Niemier lukasz@niemier.pl
From Łukasz Niemier to ~technomancy/fennel
> unless I misunderstood you, `if` should be enough here, no? > > (if check1 action1 > check2 action 2) I must have missed that syntax in the docs. Sorry for bother. -- Łukasz Niemier lukasz@niemier.pl
From Łukasz Niemier to ~technomancy/fennel
Sometimes I need to change some conditions and **I know** that only one will be true. It would be handy to have built-in macro that would allow something like
(cond
check1 action1
check2 action2)
Right now the only way to achieve something similar from what I see is to do
(match true
(_ ? check1) action1
(_ ? check2) action2)
Does anyone have macro that would achieve something like that? Maybe it would be useful to have such functionality built in.