~how

Recent activity

Re: ERIS v1.0.0 2 years ago

From hellekin to ~pukkamustard/eris

On 8/23/22 13:36, pukkamustard wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On behalf of the ERIS maintainers, it it my great pleasure to announce
> the release of ERIS v1.0.0:
> 
> https://codeberg.org/eris/spec/src/tag/v1.0.0
> 

Congratulations!

\o/

Re: Keeping the Source Flowing 2 years ago

From hellekin to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

On 8/8/22 11:08, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> 
>> I don't have much time to improve support specifically for Software
>> Heritage, but if an interested user wants to champion it, by all means
>> do so :)
> 
> That's totally fair. And, to be clear, it was not my intention to ask
> Sourcehut (or you specifically) to do anything ad-hoc to support our own
> non-profit mission :-) We just live in a limited-resource world and we
> cannot commit either to work on the Sourcehut-side of this ATM.
> 
> Maybe some contributor (of either project!) will pick this up; or we can
> just reconsider it in the future when suitable resources come up. In the
> meantime do not hesitate to ping me (or anyone else among our devs on

Keeping the Source Flowing 2 years ago

From hellekin to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

This is a bit off-topic, but as it may affect sr.ht itself and lots of 
its community, I think it's worth mentioning. If there are other public 
venues where this is being discussed, I'd be glad to know.

https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/04/gitlab_data_retention_policy/

In the last couple of years, many free software projects moved away from 
Github to Gitlab, and then to Codeberg. Sourcehut remains a bit of a 
niche compared to the last two, but this upcoming move of Gitlab to 
remove dormant repositories could precipitate a new exodus, as people 
will look for solutions for long-term hosting of historical or stable code.

I know the Software Heritage project (Zack Cced) exists and will 
probably benefit in a way from this situation if it has the capacity to

Re: ERIS v0.4.0 2 years ago

From hellekin to ~pukkamustard/eris

On 5/13/22 10:04, pukkamustard wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> It is my great pleasure to announce the release of ERIS v0.4.0:
> 

Fantastic work! Thank you pukkamustard and Emery!

> I'm also very happy to announce that we have received funding from
> NLnet/NGI Assure to finalize the encoding, develop implementations and
> applications. See also the project plan for details
> (https://codeberg.org/eris/meta/src/branch/main/ngi-assure/project-plan.org).
>

[PATCH v2] Demonstrate that I can use git send-email 2 years ago

From hellekin to ~sircmpwn/email-test-drive

---
 how | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 100644 how

diff --git a/how b/how
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7fbef93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/how
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
I have successfully used git send-email!
\ No newline at end of file
--
[message trimmed]

[PATCH] Demonstrate that I can use git send-email 2 years ago

From hellekin to ~sircmpwn/email-test-drive

---
 how | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 create mode 100644 how

diff --git a/how b/how
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6d0ecfd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/how
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
I'm about to try git send-email
-- 
2.30.2
[message trimmed]

Re: License chooser? 3 years ago

From hellekin to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

On 1/11/22 10:04 AM, Jiri Vlasak wrote:
> 
> You mean like https://git.fsfe.org/reuse/tool ?
> 

Yes, the REUSE (https://reuse.software) team put a lot of thought into 
licensing issues, notably that many repositories reusing code probably 
have more than one license to handle.

It would be great that sr.ht supports the LICENSES/ directory instead of 
the mainstream LICENSE files used by Git..b, or the terrible "Choose a 
License" site that does not promote software freedom nor reuse.

Regards,