On 19/09/2023, 23:19, Robin Jarry wrote:
> How about "show-thread-context" instead to match the style object name
> (see below)?
Wouldn't it be better "show-message-context"? Since the command really applies to messages and not threads and given that, in notmuch, a thread is an auto-contained object, "thread-context" sounds a bit weird to me.

Also, currently the command applies to all the listed messages in current folder/query: either we use "show-messages-context", in plural, or we change the behaviour of the command to apply to just the selected message. The later feels more natural to me, since one is generally focusing on a single thread when in need for drilling (maybe "drill" could be a short synonym?).

> The "borrowed" term feels weird. How about msglist_thread_context
> instead?
I'd say the same: msglist_message_context.

m2¢

This is nice too!

Tested-By: inwit <inwit@sindominio.net>

Works as advertised.

Tested-By: inwit <inwit@sindominio.net>

Beautiful!

Tested-By: inwit <inwit@sindominio.net>

Which backend are you using? I can't reproduce in notmuch+maildir.

This is great. Setting mgslist_borrowed.dim=true works nicely. Thanks!

Tested-By: inwit <inwit@sindominio.net>	


On 07/09/2023, 18:45, Tim Culverhouse wrote:
> Add a UI config value to enable showing of an "entire thread", similar
> to `notmuch show --entire-thread=true`. Add an associated style called
> "msglist_borrowed" which can be used to style such messages.
>
> Currently this feature is only supported by notmuch. It would be
> possible for maildir to implement as well, IMAP with gmail custom
> extensions, and JMAP. This patch merely implements the notmuch version
> and puts the groundwork in for handling these sorts of displays.

Darn. I replied to the wrong thread. Sorry for the noise.


El 05/09/2023 a las 3:31, inwit dejó escrito:
> Looks better now! Thanks, Robin!
>
> Tested-By: inwit <inwit@sindominio.net>	

Looks better now! Thanks, Robin!

Tested-By: inwit <inwit@sindominio.net>

Thanks, Robin. It works as advertised, but I noticed that the order of the headers is changed. If I leave To: empty, once in the review screen the To: header is placed at the bottom of the header list, instead of at the top. Shouldn't we respect the header order as laid down in the editor by the user?

Tested-By: inwit <inwit@sindominio.net>

El 04/09/2023 a las 6:07, Vitaly Ovchinnikov dejó escrito:
> I personally use a wide monitor and am more than happy to have the
> mime stuff as far away as possible, as it doesn't really matter to me
> at all. I prefer seeing the file names and they are now conveniently
> on the left. If I really need the mime type I could always highlight
> the attachment in question and then look to the right along the
> selection cursor to see the mime type. I would even prefer having a
> special style for mime types one day to dim them a bit.
+1