From Jon Fineman to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
Would it be possible to associate a SSH Key with a specific git repo instead of only at the account level? Depending on what this really means it could overlap with this thread. <https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss/%3CCEGEEBGIUEUS.2S2ZG4B0LCHZL%40taiga%3E#%3CCEH3AM4Q1JFV.GJHEVV2JNXIV@taiga%3E> > git.sr.ht's ACL system doesn't really need to change and isn't part of > this effort - rather, it's the model for this effort, if anything. The > only change which is planned for git.sr.ht ACLs is support for adding > permissions to specific SSH keys rather than for specific users. Or maybe this request. <https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss/%3CCFBBCBC5-3A0E-45EF-BBDF-023FC9CC1763%40traduction-libre.org%3E> Thanks.
From Jon Fineman to ~sircmpwn/aerc
"Robin Jarry" <robin@jarry.cc> writes: > > It looks like this should be handled by the email client itself. > copy-to= should do something special depending on the account type. For > imap/maildir, it only means saving the message in a folder. However for > notmuch, it would require some additional steps. Maybe a completely > different action. > > What do you think? >
From Jon Fineman to ~rjarry/aerc-devel
"Robin Jarry" <robin@jarry.cc> writes: > > It looks like this should be handled by the email client itself. > copy-to= should do something special depending on the account type. For > imap/maildir, it only means saving the message in a folder. However for > notmuch, it would require some additional steps. Maybe a completely > different action. > > What do you think? >
From Jon Fineman to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On 2020-05-30 22:35, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > > >> On Sun, 2020-05-31 at 09:49 +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: >>> All the licenses that exist in the FOSS ecology are licenses that >>> *protect* copyright. They don't make copyright weaker. >> >> Copyright needs no protection or clarification. Copyright is >> automatically, immediately, and exclusively granted to an author when a >> creative* work is fixed in a tangible form. Unless granted >> permission/license by the author, no one has any right to distribute or >> make copies of the work. No license protects or weakens copyright, per
From Jon Fineman to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On 2020-05-28 21:07, Drew DeVault wrote: > I'm looking for user feedback on a set of proposed changes to the terms > of service. You can read the full diff here: > > > The short of it is that all public projects would be required to use > licenses approved by the Free Software Foundation, Open Source > Initiative, or Creative Commons, within 90 days of appearing on sr.ht. > These changes, if we moved forward with them, would be announced 90 days > in advance to give you ample time to deal with the changes as necessary > for your projects. >
From Jon Fineman to ~sircmpwn/aerc
When viewing a message and after exiting pager (less) and going back to the message list a less process is left running for each message viewed.