~jpgleeson

https://www.jpgleeson.com

~jpgleeson/public-inbox

Last active 1 year, 2 months ago
View more

Recent activity

Re: gmnisrv - SSL Cert Rejected 2 months ago

From to ~sircmpwn/gmni-discuss

> Does your client support TOFU properly? We use a self-signed cert.

Almost certainly not, first time trying to implement something like this.
Going to dig back in and try figure it out. Still confuses me why it
works the first time around though.

Cheers,
Jack

gmnisrv - SSL Cert Rejected 2 months ago

From to ~sircmpwn/gmni-discuss

Running into an SSL authentication error when trying to access drewdevault.com
through my client spawsh. Everything works the first time I request a page, but
any subsequent requests will fail and the connection will be terminated.

https://sr.ht/~jpgleeson/spawsh/

This may be caused by bad behaviour in my application, but everything was
working until today. Last time I checked before that was about a week ago.
Additionally, other sites do not seem to have this issue.

Is there a list of other gemini sites running gmnisrv I can use to see if
it's localised to the server and my code is at fault?

Cheers,

[PATCH git.sr.ht] Fix breadcrumb text clipping issue 4 months ago

From jack gleeson to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev

Fixing issue on low resolutions / narrow screens where the breadcrumb
menu items overlap under the reference items to the right. This is
closer to the hg.sr.ht layout which wraps on narrow screens.
---
 scss/main.scss | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/scss/main.scss b/scss/main.scss
index 4aacbda..0f251d6 100644
--- a/scss/main.scss
+++ b/scss/main.scss
@@ -414,7 +414,6 @@ img {
  display: flex;

[message trimmed]

Text overlap bug 4 months ago

From to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

We can fix this by removing the

white-space: nowrap;

value that applies to breadcrumb in the css. Happy to submit a patch for this if that's acceptable.

Image here showing this change.

https://jpgleeson.com/content/srht-nowrap.png


Jack

Re: [PATCH core.sr.ht v2] Dark theme alert info box colour change. 7 months ago

From to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev

Screenshots below. I find the contrast between the two colours
a bit too close for easy reading. Maybe a better solution is
to change the link colour in the alert-info box, but this seemed
a smaller change in terms of consistency with everything else.

Original: https://jpgleeson.com/content/srht-darktheme-originalcrop.png
Patched: https://jpgleeson.com/content/srht-darktheme-modifiedcrop.png

December 19, 2020 9:30 AM, "Drew DeVault" <sir@cmpwn.com> wrote:

> Do you have a before/after screenshot to share?

[PATCH core.sr.ht v2] Dark theme alert info box colour change. 7 months ago

From jack gleeson to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev

Variables have been scoped to dark as per previous email.

I find the contrast between the links and the alert-info
boxes to be low, making them hard to read on some of my
screens. This is a change to make them a bit more readable
but feedback from others to confirm it's not just me
having a hard time reading it would be useful. 

---
 srht/scss/dark.scss | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/srht/scss/dark.scss b/srht/scss/dark.scss
index 8749fc4..b207d66 100644
[message trimmed]

[PATCH core.sr.ht] Dark theme alert info box colour change. 7 months ago

From jack gleeson to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev

---
 srht/scss/dark.scss | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/srht/scss/dark.scss b/srht/scss/dark.scss
index 8749fc4..a9f1a9f 100644
--- a/srht/scss/dark.scss
+++ b/srht/scss/dark.scss
@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@

$primary-dark: darken($primary, 10);
$success-dark: #2bb34b;
$danger-dark: #ff3e3e;
$muted-dark: $gray-400;
[message trimmed]

Re: UI Feedback on Builds 8 months ago

From to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Would using the notes box when entering the manifest
work for you here? It puts the text just below the
id of the job, not as immediately readable as the
headers above, but definitely apparent.

Re: Markup README formatting Error? 8 months ago

From to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

November 14, 2020 10:20 PM, "Tim Allen" <st@thristian.org> wrote:

>
> EF BB BF is the UTF-8 encoding of the Unicode Byte Order Mark, which is
> some applications use to detect Unicode content, and to detect which
> encoding it uses:
> 
> I say "some applications", but in practice it's almost always Windows
> applications, and specifically Windows Notepad that use a byte-order
> mark, horribly confusing Unix tools that examine the first bytes of a
> file and not the first printable character.

Thanks for this. That clears everything up. I can’t remember if either file was created in visual studio or sublime text, but both were definitely from windows.

Markup README formatting Error? 8 months ago

From to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

I know you use Jinja for markup parsing for the README 
files in the repos. Is there an issue with this where 
the first line can't start on a header markup?

I've noticed this in a number of my own repositories, 
as well as some others, e.g.

https://git.sr.ht/~jpgleeson/piaine/
https://git.sr.ht/~jpgleeson/spawsh/
https://sr.ht/~bhowell/quatch-express/

Is this an issue with files that were created on 
Windows possibly?