Detected on Tinderbox with FORTIFY_SOURCE=3.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/882295
---
Hey there,
The Tinderbox spotted a potential error in determine_target_build_name while
running tests. I traced it back to a bad concat, fix included.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, though I'm unsure if I got all the
configurations or if the contract of the function is still fulfilled following
this change (but it appears to be to me).
Thanks in advance, and have a great night!
src/functions/kernel/build_target.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/functions/kernel/build_target.c b/src/functions/kernel/build_target.c
index 07b20e29..2ecc27c4 100644
--- a/src/functions/kernel/build_target.c+++ b/src/functions/kernel/build_target.c
@@ -307,7 +307,6 @@ determine_target_build_name(struct workspace *wk, struct obj_build_target *tgt,
obj name_pre, obj name_suff, char plain_name[BUF_SIZE_2k])
{
const char *pref, *suff, *ver_suff = NULL;
- uint32_t i; switch (tgt->type) {
case tgt_executable:
@@ -341,10 +340,7 @@ determine_target_build_name(struct workspace *wk, struct obj_build_target *tgt,
suff = get_cstr(wk, name_suff);
}
- i = snprintf(plain_name, BUF_SIZE_2k, "%s%s", pref, get_cstr(wk, tgt->name));- if (suff) {- snprintf(&plain_name[i], BUF_SIZE_2k, ".%s", suff);- }+ snprintf(plain_name, BUF_SIZE_2k, "%s%s%s%s", pref, get_cstr(wk, tgt->name), suff ? "." : "", suff ? suff : ""); tgt->build_name = make_strf(wk, "%s%s%s", plain_name, ver_suff ? "." : "", ver_suff ? ver_suff : "");
return true;
--
2.38.1