jman, 2024-01-07 15:00 +0100:
> To be honest I think that that page could use a little help in
> clarifying what Sourcehut offers, what is free and what will become
> paid.

The information is a bit scattered indeed. It's explicitly called alpha
for a good reason. Besides, perhaps, the owners haven't decided and settled
on exact business model yet. Alpha and beta trials will help with that
too.

There is also this other bit at <https://meta.sr.ht/register>
about contributor/free vs maintainer/paid accounts. You have to be
signed out to avoid a redirect to see it. Alternatively, see it here:

On Sun, 7 Jan 2024, at 12:51, GMD Ephir wrote:
> It is strange to me, since Sourcehut service requires money to use
> those features.

Quote from <https://sourcehut.org/pricing>:

"Notice: sr.ht is currently in alpha, and the quality of the service may
reflect that. As such, payment is currently optional, and only
encouraged for users who want to support the ongoing development of the
site. For a summary of the guarantees and limitations that the alpha
entails, see this reference [1]."

 [1] https://sourcehut.org/alpha-details

Lexi Winter, 2024-01-04 16:27 +0000:
> - when i re-sent the mail, i had to host the images on an external
>   website; if that website ever goes offline (or removes the images)
>   then the discussion will no longer make sense, since the context is
>   missing.
> 
> i'm not necessarily suggesting that lists should accept image
> attachments, but i wonder: is there currently a better way to handle
> situations like this, or should there be?

I can relate to your desire to keep everything related together.
A few thoughts to muse:

Technical. You could bypass MIME filtering and in-line your binary in

The page <https://sourcehut.org/consultancy> also fails to load images
hosted at l.sr.ht. I remember seeing them not so long ago: according to
my browser history data, it was around the end of November 2023.
So, if it helps, the regression took place some time between then and now.

Hello. I've spotted a small issue on the Sourcehut blog. The following
page does not display the image (chat screenshot) in a browser, although
the file is accessible directly. It must be some CSP/CORS
misconfiguration, I suppose.

-   https://sourcehut.org/blog/2021-11-29-announcing-the-chat.sr.ht-public-beta/