~mkaito

Canaries

~mkaito/imap_unseen

Last active 5 years ago

~mkaito/dust-dev

Last active 5 years ago
View more

Recent activity

Re: Support for sourcehut nix flakes added in Nix 2.7 2 years ago

From Chris Höppner to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

El 12 de marzo de 2022 17:16:57 UTC, Gabriel Fontes <eu@misterio.me> escribió:
>Hey folks!
>
>To any Nix users around who might be interested, support for `sourcehut` 
>flakes has been introduced (by yours truly) with the 2.7 version (now 
>available on nixos-unstable).
>
>You can use the easier to remember (and more bandwidth efficient) type 
>for referring to flakes hosted on `git.sr.ht` (or any other sourcehut 
>git/hg instance, just specify a `host` attribute). Works both on the Nix 
>commands and as inputs on other flakes.
>
>For example, building a flake package from a git.sr.ht repo:
>`nix build sourcehut:~misterio/misterio.me`

Re: Fork proposal 3 years ago

From Chris Höppner to ~sircmpwn/aerc

>[Relying on plain-text email is a 'barrier to entry' for kernel development, says Linux Foundation board member](https://lobste.rs/s/0jt525/relying_on_plain_text_email_is_barrier)

Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Someone saying something doesn't necessarily make it true. I disagree with what this person said, for example.

How plaintext email is such a polarising topic is beyond me. Get your act together. Or are you just trolling?

Re: Is there any interest in sr.ht merchandise? 3 years ago

From Chris Höppner to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

El March 15, 2021 5:10:24 PM UTC, Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> escribió:
>Every now and then someone expresses interest in obtaining sr.ht
>merchandise - stuff like stickers, T-shirts, coffee mug, etc. It would
>be fairly easy to set such a thing up - there are several companies
>that
>provide mostly hands-off online merchandise stores these days.
>
>If you're interested, reply to this thread, or just click this URL:
>
>https://drewdevault.com/merch-interest.txt
>
>I'll grep my access logs later to estimate if the volume would be
>sufficient to justify the cost.

Re: Matrix instead of IRC? 4 years ago

From Christian Höppner to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

On 2020-11-11  2:34 PM, notramo@protonmail.com wrote:
> IRC is centralised and a very old protocol.
Old indeed, but it is actually federated.

> There are much better alternatives for support chat.

I'd argue that "better" is subjective. I like IRC. I don't like Matrix. For me,
IRC is "better". For you, it is not.

> It lacks many features, too: https://matrix.org/faq/#what-is-the-difference-between-matrix-and-irc%3F
> Matrix is a modern, federated, open standard with default E2EE (with unique
> cross-device signing feature), media, video and audio call support, widgets,
> guest users (no registration needed) and many more.

Re: Initial PGP support added 4 years ago

From Chris Höppner to ~sircmpwn/aerc

Just curious, why did you decide to keep your own keyring? I'm fairly unlikely to put my key anywhere that's not my hardware token.

Re: [PATCH] Add tab completion to textinputs 5 years ago

From Christian Höppner to ~sircmpwn/aerc

On 2019-07-25  6:09 PM, Drew DeVault wrote:
> Do we have a tangible use-case for this yet?

I would suggest completing mail folder names for :mv and :cf, and completing
file system names for :cd as most potentially ergonomic implementations.