~mpu/qbe

1

Re: [PATCH] Add module-level inline assembly

Richard McCormack <a.strange.enigma@gmail.com>
Details
Message ID
<CAP7DWQN0mkYqY6sTimaAZWuxMVp=7nPB5xtYXPZNiku5OH6Kug@mail.gmail.com>
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
> i don't know if this would be useful to other folks, but we
> already have the ability to add global-level assembly through separate
> .s files which are compiled into the final binary

IMHO, being able to eliminate separate .s files is useful on its own.
I would definitely make use of this for that reason.

Re: [PATCH] Add module-level inline assembly

Details
Message ID
<1da39e0a-8b4a-4488-a97c-ba873856808f@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<CAP7DWQN0mkYqY6sTimaAZWuxMVp=7nPB5xtYXPZNiku5OH6Kug@mail.gmail.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024, at 02:27, Richard McCormack wrote:
>> i don't know if this would be useful to other folks, but we
>> already have the ability to add global-level assembly through separate
>> .s files which are compiled into the final binary
>
> IMHO, being able to eliminate separate .s files is useful on its own.
> I would definitely make use of this for that reason.

What do you mean? You just want a convenience feature to pack
your asm within qbe ir files? I'd expect one thing frontend
writers appreciate is that qbe ir is target agnostic and, with
asm inlined, it is no more.
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)