Jason Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > In case there are still any problems and/or patches around
> > we still have not included into the CVS state of Pth (see
> > http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/), please do not hesitate to repost them
> > here again. Perhaps they were just lost or overlooked. I'll try to
> > make sure they are considered again.
> 
> Following is a patch that I posted, and it has not been committed.  As
> noted in its explanation, it may not suite the needs of the maintainers,
> but if you provide some feedback, I'm perfectly willing to do the work to
> make it acceptable.

Hello Ralf and the list,

I would like to kindly point out that there has been no response
whatsoever (that I've seen) to Jason's email sent back on June 30,
nor have the changes been incorporated into pth (according to the
http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/).

This is somewhat ironic, given this particular thread...

Cheers,
-Archie

__________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs     *     Packet Design     *     http://www.packetdesign.com

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:59:21PM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Jason Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > > In case there are still any problems and/or patches around
> > > we still have not included into the CVS state of Pth (see
> > > http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/), please do not hesitate to repost them
> > > here again. Perhaps they were just lost or overlooked. I'll try to
> > > make sure they are considered again.
> > 
> > Following is a patch that I posted, and it has not been committed.  As
> > noted in its explanation, it may not suite the needs of the maintainers,
> > but if you provide some feedback, I'm perfectly willing to do the work to
> > make it acceptable.
> 
> Hello Ralf and the list,
> 
> I would like to kindly point out that there has been no response
> whatsoever (that I've seen) to Jason's email sent back on June 30,
> nor have the changes been incorporated into pth (according to the
> http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/).
> 
> This is somewhat ironic, given this particular thread...

I also sent email directly to Ralf, and heard no response from that
either.

As things stand, I can't help but form the grudging opionion that pth is
being squatted on.  Pretending to maintain a project without actually doing
so is worse than doing nothing at all, since it discourages others from
filling the void.

Jason