From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/discussion
Hello, We belong to a student group, LKCAMP [1], which is focused on sharing kernel and free software development knowledge and mentoring newcomers to become contributors to these projects. As part of our efforts, we'll be organizing a hackathon to convert the drm selftests in drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/ (and possibly the ones in drivers/dma-buf too) to the KUnit framework. It will take place on October 30. So please expect to receive some patches from our mentees on that date. It probably won't be a big volume (experience tells it'll be around half a dozen patches). We'll also make sure to do an internal review beforehand to catch common first-timer mistakes and teach the basics.
From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/patches
Hello, Any update on the review of this patch? Jiri Pirko? Thanks, Nícolas On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 02:31:07PM +0800, David Gow wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:55 PM José Aquiles Guedes de Rezende > <jjoseaquiless@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Convert the parman test module to use the KUnit test framework. > > This makes the test clearer by leveraging KUnit's assertion macros > > and test case definitions,as well as helps standardize on a testing framework.
From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/patches
Oi Aquiles, respondendo em português mesmo e só internamente na nossa lista de emails. Eu vi que você já recebeu vários reviews e até já mandou esse v2, bem legal! :D Um detalhe é que você não colocou a lista do KUnit em cópia: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Não precisa reenviar só por isso, claro, só estou falando pra você lembrar de adicionar na v3 caso pedirem pra alterar mais alguma coisa :). Outra coisa, essas tags que os revisores colocam, quando você reenvia uma nova versão do patch, você tem que adicionar no seu commit, depois dos
From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/patches
Hi Aquiles, On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 08:16:15PM -0300, José Aquiles Guedes de Rezende wrote: > Convert the parman test module to use the KUnit test framework. > This makes thetest clearer by leveraging KUnit's assertion macros > and test case definitions,as well as helps standardize on a testing framework. > > Co-developed-by: Matheus Henrique de Souza Silva <matheushenriquedesouzasilva@protonmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Matheus Henrique de Souza Silva <matheushenriquedesouzasilva@protonmail.com> > Signed-off-by: José Aquiles Guedes de Rezende <jjoseaquiless@gmail.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: > - Format according checkpatch.pl
From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/patches
Hi Aquiles, On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 10:39:57PM -0300, José Aquiles Guedes de Rezende wrote: > Convert the parman test module to use the KUnit test framework. > This makes thetest clearer by leveraging KUnit's assertion macros > and test case definitions,as well as helps standardize on a testing framework. > > Co-developed-by: Matheus Henrique de Souza Silva <matheushenriquedesouzasilva@protonmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Matheus Henrique de Souza Silva <matheushenriquedesouzasilva@protonmail.com> > Signed-off-by: José Aquiles Guedes de Rezende <jjoseaquiless@gmail.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: > - Format according checkpatch.pl
From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/patches
Hi again forgot to add something... On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:25:45PM -0300, José Aquiles Guedes de Rezende wrote: > test_parman.c is an unit test for the parman.c > using debug messages and returning errors. > Convert the test to use KUnit framework. > Use KUnit features like memory allocation. > In KUnit there is no need to fully compile > the kernel or use virtual machine to run the > tests, just run the kunit.py. The commit message should only talk about the change you did and why it is a
From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/patches
Hi Aquiles, By the way, just in case you weren't able to run your test, I managed to run it by 1. adding the needed configs for your test in the .kunit/.kunitconfig file: CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y CONFIG_PARMAN=y CONFIG_TEST_PARMAN=y 2. using the x86_64 architecture instead of the default (UML): tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64
From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/patches
Oi Enzo, On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 08:59:09PM -0300, Enzo Ferreira wrote: > Adiciona o teste exemplo de KUnit > > Signed-off-by: Enzo Ferreira <ferreiraenzoa@gmail.com> > Essa linha em branco não é necessária. > --- Seria legal adicionar um "changelog" do que você mudou entre a versão 1 e a 2 agora. Ajuda quem está revisando a saber o que mudou. Se quiser uma ideia de
From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/discussion
Olá,
Com base nos dias de disponibilidade colocados no forms, decidimos
os seguintes dias de evento:
- 3 de julho: Ramp-Up de Kernel Linux
- 10 de julho: Hackathon KUnit
Horário (ambos os dias): 9-12h, 13-17h (pausa flexível)
O Ramp-Up será focado em quem tem pouca/nenhuma experiência com o Kernel Linux.
Será coberto o básico da configuração e compilação do kernel, além de como
enviar um patch para lista de email com o git.
From Nícolas F. R. A. Prado to ~lkcamp/patches
Remove literal markup from known constants, instead relying on automarkup.py to make them into literals. Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <n@nfraprado.net> --- Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst | 48 +++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst index a137a0e6d068..6e608e2e8e5b 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The XArray implementation is efficient when the indices used are densely [message trimmed]