Received: from mail.macaw.me (mail.macaw.me [45.79.76.58]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1782FF114 for <~nhanb/mcross-devel@lists.sr.ht>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=macaw.me header.i=@macaw.me header.b=wNcoDZsx Received: from [10.23.6.93] (unknown [114.87.43.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.macaw.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 801F93AE290; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:13:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=macaw.me; s=main; t=1592316826; bh=Krr++N/mjHvREPu+p496PHoM9TPVpkHFCLYfnjXPXIY=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:From; b=wNcoDZsx5xe8/jiUCEY7tSgoO3HWOerg9rZnfp/+r2E37seJQ8onr8OMz0z3rN20H h+c3SBKM+Ehcj1R3M6MCmuj32vvjOB9QHVF7qcZXKlNYU31fHFiFzW3TCDDA8D6Ezj pfbhYu3uMtfnF59XbY5WK6TjKjZlZ/CCEsyOqelGItXj8PS7D3w2YFZqWO7hQzLQ+l dmcgkkE1fLTesQcj9knUYX4Dn2BPVoGinQLa+mE913oxgfcMSYthpjryJT+HTAwe07 UvRvcNxtqwN5i7NeVbAdCv/dI7ltSp0YA5BR8yTeXe7H2PdU4/ILkFizssk3Lzx/al wXhjBhUZX4HRw== Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:13:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1a036adb-faf5-9ca6-4010-e205bd36ea86@imnhan.com> References: <20200614141653.12420-1-fkfd@macaw.me> <1a036adb-faf5-9ca6-4010-e205bd36ea86@imnhan.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Autocrypt: addr=fkfd@macaw.me; keydata= mQENBF6eKpwBCADplVbMn3SYucvkjbU3PlSoaXHznCxReAzyiGTQr+u7O0HDhRpQ3tXu0YSPPyPM JZZwwPlstnuJY/1W/ItgoX6uTuCD27tS/dt6emKl2nCeP58EtSKULffyjanml55TOO/qnqwvGIyN CMYR2kH3HqGOVmmSsGMoPs0bkLBMka9MQrhx4EzEiKMzhUXKJs2cGfLjh7vLm5M5OhXm/qd/4IJp ttD154SLM8SPYE1IATNVKWCvgXvR7IdvLLBdy2tJRqpeswXztcG9zNJquNV+lcbecI335I+ewENq 5AtvMRn/wnq5G8nEMBVb5Ls0dN4AmDEr35li9j7jJ2S/d4dapiBxABEBAAG0HUZyZWRlcmljayBZ aW4gPGZrZmRAbWFjYXcubWU+iQFOBBMBCAA4FiEE69NTllCMdV87ulRY81UcawHbd/8FAl6eKpwC Gy8FCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ81UcawHbd/+2DQf/f7xbAtmN6+IIOhDckMx+ 5ZSJZep9hfbwd7PrqM52pjx/RV3RpKqThKQ5DDuQqBBBZP3rMKNsIUhqaP2VGOBnOlPOzgxEU95/ txwVtH/noWZOyqvqtMUeM4Nw/CTdnCEX699BKFrWP6ApGMK/ZqUFsn9XtHozm7+UGV5RYKQE+tou qqlyYH5WHnhG7Pg/7VN4tjb+vqRZkODoN98dp9Z1OBdvRcrupHqUWus5toymiUSK2XWYH/LsAKLL olB0ZEGkzF82qqsn/DyigbcBukMKFvsHuku0AZ5wQ1gjGdO5e1LhJulOiDDcvgUGyAe15bg5Nw3C xIuj7zS6UvyoUYvPMQ== Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support alt text for preformatted text To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=F9i_Th=E0nh_Nh=E2n?= ,~nhanb/mcross-devel@lists.sr.ht From: Frederick Yin Message-ID: On June 16, 2020 6:56:21 AM UTC, "B=C3=B9i Th=C3=A0nh Nh=C3=A2n" wrote: > > In Gemini's new, pending spec > >Aw crap, looks like it's promoted to official spec now=2E Do you know if= =20 >they maintain some version controlled repo of the spec?=20 I guess not, but I can quote solderpunk's summary on spec updates: ----- BEGIN QUOTATION ----- SUMMARY OF CHANGES: * A gemini:// URI scheme is formally defined for the first time, explicitly disallowing the use of the userinfo subcomponent of the authority component=2E * The client certificate system has been substantially simplified, with transient certificates no long a formally defined concept with prescribed behaviour=2E * A lightweight notion of alt text for pre-formatted content has been introduced as a tentative step toward fixing the worst search and accessibility related problems with pre-formatted non-textual content=2E No special structures or semantics for alt text are defined - if a convention for doing this organically arises in the community it may become a recommended best practice=2E * A few minor corrections and tidyups=2E ----- END OF QUOTATION ----- >Implementing an evolving spec with neither a changelog nor a diff is=2E= =2E=2E not fun=2E Do you subscribe to the Gemini list? If so you can catch up with the impor= tant updates*=2E >There's no excuse for missing the "Any line whose first three >characters=20 >are ```" though=2E My bad=2E > >Guess I'll comb through the new spec=2E * Plus a dozen times more of other updates=2E ~fkfd