Re: [PATCH] Signal: fix missing profile.name handling

Message ID
DKIM signature
Download raw message
>using "no name" as a fallback
I think it would be better to just leave the name attribute to None in this case.
Most XMPP clients should display the user part of the JID in the absence of a name
field in the roster, which would be the phone number in the case of signal.
What do you think?

— Nicoco
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)