~pbarker

Nottingham, UK

https://pbarker.dev/

~pbarker/public-inbox

Last active 10 hours ago

~pbarker/test

Last active 5 months ago
View more

Recent activity

Re: [meta-linux-mainline][PATCH 1/3] linux-stable: Uprev recipes a day ago

From Paul Barker to ~pbarker/public-inbox

On Wed, 17 Nov 2021, at 19:43, Cedric Veilleux wrote:
> New kernel versions:
>
>     * 4.4.292
>     * 4.9.290
>     * 4.14.255
>     * 4.19.217
>     * 5.4.160
>     * 5.10.79
>     * 5.14.19
>
> Signed-off-by: Cedric Veilleux <veilleux.cedric@gmail.com>

Apologies for the ridiculously late response to these patches. I've had ongoing health issues so haven't been able to put time into updating things here for a while.

Re: Email header corruption in mbox archives 6 months ago

From Paul Barker to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

On Sun, 30 May 2021 14:00:47 +0100
"Paul Barker" <paul@pbarker.dev> wrote:

> On Sun, 30 May 2021, at 13:34, Drew DeVault wrote:
> > On Sun May 30, 2021 at 8:32 AM EDT, Paul Barker wrote:
> > >
> > > This mangling causes patatt to die when trying to parse the
> > > headers in the downloaded mbox file. That's obviously a bug in
> > > patatt, it should reject the signature rather than crashing, but
> > > that's a bug to solve elsewhere. I think the header corruption
> > > when exporting an mbox file is likely to be a bug in sourcehut as
> > > email headers should be passed through without modification. Am I
> > > right on that? Or is there some user error/misunderstanding I
> > > haven't noticed?  

Claws Mail test 6 months ago

From Paul Barker to ~pbarker/test

Testing claws-mail.

This should hopefully wrap long lines correctly, preventing issues with
displaying messages.

    However, it should be possible to preserve long lines (like this one) if they are pasted into an email.

Thanks,

-- 
Paul Barker
https://pbarker.dev/

Re: Email header corruption in mbox archives 6 months ago

From Paul Barker to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

On Sun, 30 May 2021, at 13:34, Drew DeVault wrote:
> On Sun May 30, 2021 at 8:32 AM EDT, Paul Barker wrote:
> > X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=672; h=from:subject;
> > bh=C40yOKgIfnNIUP+OW9WyPdBfljkZPpfUL1NepOODlx8=;
> > b=owGbwMvMwCF2w7xIXuiX9CvG02pJDAmb67lTNi0+IeF97TL76vtKD7xjSjaluz0o/KfmZLX8rMi7
> > l3M6O0pZGMQ4GGTFFFl2z951+fqDJVt7b0gHw8xhZQIZwsDFKQATydFhZJi+fFfvJ8+0MF7GrfzWnP
> > K7mAM/3n/r/UC+bprf6/g114QYGdbHcsaK7b1nanfA4IeZi1V0lL26cruXUWxgSEnNDP1FrAA=
> > X-Developer-Key: i=paul@pbarker.dev; a=openpgp;
> > fpr=D2DDFDAE30017AF4CB62AA96A67255DFCCE62ECD
> >
> > However, looking at the mbox export of this message [3], the headers
> > appear mangled:
> >
> > X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=672; h=from:subject;

Email header corruption in mbox archives 6 months ago

From Paul Barker to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Hi folks,

I'm currently testing out patatt[1] which inserts additional headers into patch emails to allow them to be cryptographically verified, providing attestation that a patch does indeed come from the purported author. I'd like to use this as part of my workflow for handling patches submitted to a mailing list hosted on sr.ht.

I set up a test mailing list and sent a signed patch by email. The headers can be seen in the raw email [2]:

    X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=672; h=from:subject;
        bh=C40yOKgIfnNIUP+OW9WyPdBfljkZPpfUL1NepOODlx8=;
        b=owGbwMvMwCF2w7xIXuiX9CvG02pJDAmb67lTNi0+IeF97TL76vtKD7xjSjaluz0o/KfmZLX8rMi7 l3M6O0pZGMQ4GGTFFFl2z951+fqDJVt7b0gHw8xhZQIZwsDFKQATydFhZJi+fFfvJ8+0MF7GrfzWnP K7mAM/3n/r/UC+bprf6/g114QYGdbHcsaK7b1nanfA4IeZi1V0lL26cruXUWxgSEnNDP1FrAA=
    X-Developer-Key: i=paul@pbarker.dev; a=openpgp; fpr=D2DDFDAE30017AF4CB62AA96A67255DFCCE62ECD

However, looking at the mbox export of this message [3], the headers appear mangled:

    X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=672; h=from:subject;

Test Email 6 months ago

From Paul Barker to ~pbarker/test

Let's see how this works!

-- 
Paul Barker
https://pbarker.dev/