If you are still looking for suggestions how about the following:
1. use-feature (perhaps what use-package should have been named)
2. configure (maybe too generic)
Re: Can you please change the package name for setup.el
Niall Dooley <dooleyn@gmail.com> writes:
> If you are still looking for suggestions how about the following:>> 1. use-feature (perhaps what use-package should have been named)
Right, but that is also an indication that it is wrong, because setup.el
is more general.
> 2. configure (maybe too generic)
That would be fine, but not any better. I suspect the complaints many
raise against the current name would still apply.
But thank you for your suggestions, this or that way.
Re: Can you please change the package name for setup.el
Niall Dooley <dooleyn@gmail.com> writes:
> How about setpkg so it is similar to the new setopt?
I believe there was a similar suggestion wrt. to including "pkg" or
"package" in the name, which I still do not really like, because of the
implication that the setup macro is directly related to packages.