Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=protesilaos.com header.i=@protesilaos.com Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8339011EF8C for <~protesilaos/denote@lists.sr.ht>; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 15:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: public@protesilaos.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B45F3FF802; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 15:18:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protesilaos.com; s=gm1; t=1666883930; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=S1DRgv6nliLc6oR9x1RewreOt+pEuVdmyAJuLnWsuc0=; b=ncO55Qq1EbLD+YBovfP+hWHQVWxfGY7GyUUGIrwv/fizDzCKKJylRFu4vAuXq3aaCbD0ov hjBJN26G+GgjUvNspDo42x+HEAwdmqDtG6sBMLjXwsEJWhGwnTN67CnkF5++9MxluysByi /ZSFCP/KY8otQj60TY08cauHge5+0lyM4bZfAL9bRd+ZcFukQPMKtyMlyMEBbGs9pVRg0s 5DocgzZNjCcQQvAFWouj/xAVjVUitWrHyMiZPNuQ6g1w6pnvz7iZ63oxlq/ZDAOpWBy0wr rMmgh7GArrP97aTkq/FMkxLz515bxTfDG32TKeNkick13qU5U8o1NX05N6KlTQ== From: Protesilaos Stavrou To: Noboru Ota , ~protesilaos/denote@lists.sr.ht Subject: Re: [PATCH] Display context of identifier in backlinks buffer with xref In-Reply-To: <86h6zpmhpd.fsf@nobiot.com> References: <86h6zpmhpd.fsf@nobiot.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 18:18:48 +0300 Message-ID: <877d0lwazr.fsf@protesilaos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain > From: Noboru Ota > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 17:03:58 +0200 > >> This is the current commit log, since our last exchange: >> [... omitted ...] >> Please let me know if you are okay with them. >> [... omitted ...] >> I believe I have not missed anything from the latest set of patches you >> sent. If I did, it was not intentional, and please tell me about it. > > All well on my end. I tested commit ee69dae; it works for (both > with/without context). Thank you. Your reasoning makes sense to me; I > agree. You are welcome and thank you for trying it out! >> I believe the way I implemented those wrappers accommodates both the old >> backlinks' buffer and the new one with the added context. Please let me >> know if this is true on your end. > > One thing I noticed is you use 'funcall'. You could just call the > function (?) My mistake! I just pushed an update. > One additional thing I have noticed. I am sending a patch; no > functional change. Just to align the variable name 'xrefs-alist' (xrefs, > plural) to the built-in library (Xref uses singular 'xref-alist') while > it is still "hot". I installed the patch. Thank you! -- Protesilaos Stavrou https://protesilaos.com