Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=none 
Received: from mail.wservices.ch (mail.wservices.ch [136.243.84.123])
	by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C86DC11EF79
	for <~protesilaos/denote@lists.sr.ht>; Tue,  1 Nov 2022 07:46:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (29-211.dsl.iskon.hr [89.164.29.211])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.wservices.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4500FA80148
	for <~protesilaos/denote@lists.sr.ht>; Tue,  1 Nov 2022 07:46:07 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: mu4e 1.8.9; emacs 28.1
From: =?utf-8?B?U2HFoWEgSmFuacWha2E=?= <sjaniska@atmarama.net>
To: ~protesilaos/denote <~protesilaos/denote@lists.sr.ht>
Subject: using Denote with org-roam
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 08:39:35 +0100
Message-ID: <87tu3jw20x.fsf@atmarama.ddns.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

in a recent thread
(https://org-roam.discourse.group/t/denotes-file-naming-scheme-and-org-roam=
/2769/22)
at org-roam group, Noboru Ota (nobiot) helped me to achieve
interoperability  between Org-roam and Denote...iow. org-roam-ui=20
can
handle Denote's notes if the links are created with  with=20
org-roam.

Now I wonder if I'd continue using Denote (to take advantage of=20
its
(re)naming scheme, tagging etc.) with the hyperlinks created with
org-roam - in order to make them work with org-roam-ui, what could=20
I
possible lose from the sigght of Denote?


Sincerely,
Sa=C5=A1a

--=20
Whatever action a great man performs, common men follow. And
whatever standards he sets by exemplary acts, all the world=20
pursues.