Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=polytechnique.org header.i=@polytechnique.org Received: from mx1.polytechnique.org (mx1.polytechnique.org [129.104.30.34]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDA6911EED7 for <~protesilaos/ef-themes@lists.sr.ht>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from set (cbg35-2-78-242-14-140.fbx.proxad.net [78.242.14.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E51A5647C9; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:47:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=polytechnique.org; s=svoboda; t=1663861650; bh=OOZFNPpjBCwbsWtMAT5SRrZWhAogJpPjYJcDAImHxac=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID; b=GMZKE++69/m6zqsUGZpTjdUmbSLv2BDK1ItWo7TVPTytkYzC67ysCpVHT4bIZdzuv LGBJ47JvqREnvoUXAWUDCECuhUkn4gsDGXQq5F85SuLgOEHszjyqF/HimAX3VFgbbC uxnfIBj6FGtFabunD7uDxBycEkjUDFQE6HrNMvL8= From: Alan Schmitt To: Protesilaos Stavrou , ~protesilaos/ef-themes@lists.sr.ht Subject: Re: Contrast of from line in notmuch-show-mode and ef-dark In-Reply-To: <878rmbo4d5.fsf@protesilaos.com> References: <87leqe2tji.fsf@m4x.org> <87v8piqo8a.fsf@protesilaos.com> <878rmez2sd.fsf@m4x.org> <87sfkmqmw1.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87tu52q6dw.fsf@m4x.org> <87zgetjyou.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87leqdqlsd.fsf@m4x.org> <87bkr9ko65.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87edw3lhb9.fsf@m4x.org> <87pmfnvaa7.fsf@protesilaos.com> <878rmbo4d5.fsf@protesilaos.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:47:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgerjtrl.fsf@m4x.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at svoboda.polytechnique.org (Thu Sep 22 17:47:30 2022 +0200 (CEST)) X-Spam-Flag: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.419913, queueID=3B1315647CA X-Org-Mail: alan.schmitt.1995@polytechnique.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Prot, On 2022-09-22 17:44, Protesilaos Stavrou writes: > A follow-up on my work. I checked for the colour distance and contrast > between bg-main/bg-dim and bg-main/bg-alt. I copy the results further > below. This is very impressive work, thanks a lot! > These numbers are not consistent with what you are seeing because the > monitor does not reproduce black sufficiently well. So even though > ef-dark is better than ef-light for this test, it feels worse. Yes. On my bad monitor, I can easily see all the white checkered patterns, but not the black squares. I wonder how common an occurrence this is (monitors having more subjective contrast in light colors than dark colors). > The complete results below. They show that we can tweak some values to > have more consistent levels throughout, though we are still missing the > optimal target for dark themes. I=E2=80=99m actually getting used to switching themes depending on the time= of the day and the ambient light. Currently, I really like ef-duo-light as it is a light theme but still gentle to the eyes. Thanks again, Alan --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFTBAEBCAA9FiEE6lXof/BsSVW56ZmGBA0KO07S5ccFAmMsg44fHGFsYW4uc2No bWl0dEBwb2x5dGVjaG5pcXVlLm9yZwAKCRAEDQo7TtLlx6HOB/9V1rTRlqV3AadH GeddabQSKanrT9lcHlKo3n4Z7oTQdNXEBKYMaVZOdsM7A5EfGXaPbB4FOrv78atc jlDZwbZYWQx7r8fSob3UyfbpekKbIQGOWu9hJPkorZqqaQAu8qUIAffAAt3l0W4h bwL2TCBkNB2hh3aSGMAgIovxYpbaekIwmhcM3qj3IJ4y+WwLKE4tMqV5mnTx9wvx mP4IzyLJJRhLb01YJWHJcKMArxW+Yho+fY7k2HfGC+euJasJbWapWLZZC00ux7p9 2dW+Lcva6Y2q3CxlA79XFOzgXyu6L+hMMHqK7h04wlsnEnWL5FpG/hOlAUXiTUWd xJMPdP2N =lf6r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--