~proycon

Eindhoven, the Netherlands

https://proycon.anaproy.nl

  • 🐧 FOSS software enthusiast
  • 🎓 Research Sofware Engineer, Natural Language Processing
  • 🐍 Python, 🌊 C, C++, 🦀 Rust, 🐚 Shell
  • 🔐 Privacy and Security
  • 📱 Sxmo co-maintainer
  • 🏡 Home automation
  • 🌍 Language enthusiast

See my homepage at https://proycon.anaproy.nl for further details and contact info.

~proycon/public-inbox

Last active 1 year, 3 months ago
View more

Recent activity

Re: [PATCH sxmo-utils] add tilix and moment to sxmo_hook_apps.sh 13 hours ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

Thanks! Applied!

Re: [PATCH sxmo-utils] add tilix in sxmo_terminal.sh 2 days ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

Thanks! Applied!

Re: [PATCH sxmo-utils] Remove gojq proxy 3 days ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 3:07 PM CEST, Willow Barraco wrote:
> Recent jq version seems fast enough. We drop this proxy, and use jq
> directly

Looks good to me! Applied!

Re: [PATCH sxmo-svkbd] svkbd: Improve svkbd layouts 22 days ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

Nice work!

> After using wvkbd it was hard to come back to svkbd.
>
> This patch is to make the layout "similar" to wvkbd and reduce layer switching.

It's indeed a good idea to make them more consistent, that helps people
who switch between the two versions of sxmo. I'm wondering whether we
should propose this layout as a replacement of the mobile-intl layout, rather
than a new 'wvkbd-like' layout, as it is optimised for the mobile use
case and perhaps better than the current default layout? We've been
optimising wvkbd more lately and svkbd hasn't received much attention
since.

Re: [PATCH v3 sxmo-utils] alacritty: set behaviour to match other terminals 22 days ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

On Mon Mar 18, 2024 at 10:43 PM CET, Aren wrote:
> Looks good to me

Thanks! Merged!

-- 

Maarten van Gompel (proycon)

web: https://proycon.anaproy.nl
gpg: 0x39FE11201A31555C

Re: [PATCH sxmo-svkbd] Bring sxmo-svkbd to upstream 28 days ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

> So to clarify, would you like me to submit the rebased sxmo-svkbd or just the
> patch with the changes to make it look like the image I sent?

Yes, just the patch.. on top of https://git.suckless.org/svkbd/ .
Eventually we'd just forward it to their list anyway.

Re: [PATCH sxmo-svkbd] Bring sxmo-svkbd to upstream 28 days ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

> I didn't submit the rebase I completed yet. The plan was to make a new layout
> that has similarities to wvkbd but it required changes that modify a few files
> and make other layouts incompatible.
>
> That was the reason for trying to rebase the sxmo-svkbd so i can submit a patch
> for it to look like the following:
>
>  https://matrix-client.matrix.org/_matrix/media/v3/download/matrix.org/JvUQoiEGnTPkiZjFhAleLNNh?allow_redirect=true

That looks good, I like the idea of having the svkbd layout more like
the wvkbd layout so we can provide a more unified experience on both
wayland and X11.

You can just submit to this list, on top of the upstream suckless svkbd

Re: [PATCH v2 sxmo-utils] badwolf: add entry to context menu 28 days ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

Thanks! Applied!

Re: [PATCH sxmo-utils] badwolf: add entry to context menu 30 days ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

Thanks, small problem still through:

On Fri Mar 15, 2024 at 1:22 PM CET, hazardchem wrote:
> +			$icon_arr Next (Search)     ^ 0 ^ sxmo_type -M Shift -M Ctrl -k g
> +			$icon_arl Previous (Search)     ^ 0 ^ sxmo_type -M Shift -M Ctrl -M Shift -k g
> +			$icon_flt URL Bar     ^ 0 ^ sxmo_type -M Shift -M Ctrl l
> +			$icon_fnd Open Web Inspector

This last line (web inspector) is missing an action, could you resubmit with a fix?

-- 

Maarten van Gompel (proycon)

Re: [PATCH sxmo-svkbd] Bring sxmo-svkbd to upstream a month ago

From Maarten van Gompel to ~mil/sxmo-devel

On Sat Mar 9, 2024 at 12:57 PM CET, Willow Barraco wrote:
> I don't even remember which repo we was using... I'm so sorry, I'm the
> one that asked for a rebased version of those patches.

There weren't any actual contributions to svkbd on our list that I
missed right? They can go through here fine for discussion, but then we
just forward upstream to suckless. (Or submit there directly)