On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 02:28:10PM -0600, Colin Reeder wrote:
> I'm trying to review squares in area 2521, and I was able to get through a
> few of them, but now it just displays this error:
> 
> no square to CreateCommitType.REVIEW_OLDEST
> 
> (or similar for each other ordering choices)
> 
> despite the fact that it still shows "35% to review"

By default, you cannot review your own squares. If you want to do so,
you need to fill in yourself to the "which mapper" field.

If you use *JOSM damn plugin*, it's right click to the damn dialog

Thank you for the patches, all have been merged.

Thank you!

I applied the patch, fixed CI, and released damn plugin v0.14.0.

> You could add a build manifest to generate and publish the web pages via
> builds.sr.ht every time you push changes to the repo, take this example:
> 
>     https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/pages.sr.ht-examples/tree/master/item/hugo.yml

Please, note that acurl is deprecated. It is recommended to use hut
instead:

	https://srht.site/quickstart

It simplifies things as you don't need to create the archive, see the
doc:

	https://git.sr.ht/~emersion/hut/tree/master/item/doc/hut.1.scd

> Feel free to change the text or grammar. I'd send a patch, but I'm not quite
> sure where the source of the RFC lives.

Its here https://git.sr.ht/~qeef/draft-devault-bare/

I will look at your suggestions and incorporate them in the draft. Thank
you.

> Or something else to make it more obvious that I actually landed on
> some different page?

It's small detail, but the selected "subpage" (like git, builds, todo,
lists, etc...) is black instead of gray at the top of the page.

If nothing is black, it's projects hub page.

> Yeah, I don't think we need to add a lot. The schema specification is simple enough that
> I only noticed a few ambiguities and I'd also like to keep things simple.
> 
> I'll see if I can find the time to create a patch.

If you don't have time, do not hesitate to just send your (draft) ideas
here. I will process them, include them in the specification and ask for
feedback. This is how I understand my role in working on BARE.

> Also sorry for the slow response, life has been a bit hectic for me.

Please don't be sorry. We can't compare in the slowness of responses.
(Because I would win.)

---
 draft-devault-bare-10.xml | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/draft-devault-bare-10.xml b/draft-devault-bare-10.xml
index a2567f9..d42c0e9 100644
--- a/draft-devault-bare-10.xml
+++ b/draft-devault-bare-10.xml
@@ -480,8 +480,9 @@ OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
           </li>
 
           <li>
-            Unions MUST have at least one type, and each type of a union MUST
-            be unique.
[message trimmed]

> I see you updated/republished the draft RFC as well, thank you!

Yes. I also finally asked ISE for publication in independent stream [1].

> I'm currently working on a schema parser-generator for BARE:
> 
> https://git.sr.ht/~chiefnoah/bare-rs

Nice. When ready, please, don't forget to send patch to update
baremessages.org [2], thanks.

> As part of that development, I've come across a few ambiguities.

[...]

Click building is a potential feature for the mapathoner plugin that
creates rounded or squared building based on the background imagery when
clicked to the middle of the building.

I somewhere read about "coloring book formulated as multiway cut
problem" and was wondering if that approach could be used for the click
building feature?