Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com [209.85.221.49]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E5E11F172 for <~qeef/damn-project@lists.sr.ht>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 22:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id s19so868689wra.2 for <~qeef/damn-project@lists.sr.ht>; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:53:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition; bh=NHsOzbcrKzLNiFOt0xWgUceKN2Yc2tGdAbu1pYBedpA=; b=diI1QUMilDCHtOP0bCJcqVbQqisN3U+fYZzNmK22ClDRe4H8NL1gzV8RzTfCfb958O ku2cwyry6H1b2K2eraAGXHfJ9GUoo9BzU4SHrDXLWKJkfSyOFdrshsFACe+4R2/+Aa+V ppuj2r1EkVI8EjDA7K0+01B1RPqr6vyHN129AbHUCYHOXd+ABWrXtL0iGyghEPccjE0D pcT1bisOPF5J05i9ZJUWZb7moKBFS4tAoqBzLVeEeql04ws9hrV6oPx6fRO4yE4bPyZg GvL6rO1r5thxPjHRp6fVl0CyPpB2rdZMuc5sykG3Hf6wNrboU/5p/nExLSRVa06skpCR 7yng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition; bh=NHsOzbcrKzLNiFOt0xWgUceKN2Yc2tGdAbu1pYBedpA=; b=DvybRzBQOydKR7Fc3Dbm6+xqIQaxmnYH5/yFklSLePhusn8jzuIVWf0+f/lBL81A4u AVdRxmuNGhvTsxcBIcOBWm5YRLIJUA80WOitPaPZtdfhZmWzmULgrXBXD6SkWcO2enJ/ EItVs0h0j1nztZim84z7XHMQEXW++gIFoiJSD1f8WOca2j3vNGAv2Z/XZlHmM2JHBRs9 G27t+r7wlQDT5sEcwa3nZ0nGVKhxWmuTU4qu9rNFRypaPQ40UMcm5unFHy8LBY3F1Wd6 2JpidnL7//1UTm6K9qG/fm6TB0ZlYdJ3fBYzQ9u99JnsbMRlmQvDLnDOmzl1cEy+9YYh kKFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532E190NwF/tMEO/uSnbmxqXnWhIKFVGS80Q2TvIHjGb8o75NVdB B+G0c7ChMWCQv9Mv/a28ocqfxm1JTwo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1xTRRGDUty7O5A5CWD6y9YumJy0pfsZWXe5uyCbJVLiAErQmQ04jYR/75AWeLOsrdB8S5sw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f582:: with SMTP id f2mr25924323wro.65.1635288781981; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (185-170-195-217.cust.centrio.cz. [217.195.170.185]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm8988510wrw.4.2021.10.26.15.53.01 for <~qeef/damn-project@lists.sr.ht> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:52:59 +0200 From: Jiri Vlasak To: ~qeef/damn-project@lists.sr.ht Subject: Policy for finished areas Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Dear mappers, I would like to apply new policy for finishing areas. TL;DR This concerns abandoned areas so if there is some work on an area in last 90 days, the area is save. ## Policy for finishing abandoned areas 1. Finished areas I've implemented new service for finished areas. The areas that have been finished are now available [1]. Note this is JSON service, there is no client for finished areas yet. 2. Upkeep script The upkeep script finishes all the areas with priority -10 _and_ with the last commit older than one month. Finishing means that the area will be available at [1] and removed from the database. This is irreversible change. 3. Abandoned areas My proposal is to run the `abandoned_areas.py` script of the Damn (Python3) client [2] each month and set the priority to -10 for all the abandoned areas. The defaults are used for the abandoned area detection which is _less than 5 commits in last 90 days_. 4. Exceptions There are exceptions for abandoned areas -- the areas with the priority of 1 are testing areas I sometimes refer to from the OpenStreetMap diaries. These areas will not be finished. ## Conclusion I think this policy is enough for current state of the Divide and map. Now. [3]. I will apply it next month if there is no critique. In my opinion, the most disputable is (3.) If you are interested for a specific area (to keep it not -10,) consider subscribing at https://rss.damn-project.org/ Have a nice day, jiri [1]: https://finished.damn-project.org/ [2]: https://git.sr.ht/~qeef/damn-client.py [3]: https://www.damn-project.org/