~renerocksai/aercbook

4 3

aercbook build

Duke Normandin <dukeofpurl@gmx.com>
Details
Message ID
<20220907163812.a461e5132f82c26257cce787@gmx.com>
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
zig 0.10.0
aerc 0.12.0-0-gaa52b295b2ca (go1.19beta1 amd64 linux)
aercbook-v0.1.2

aercbook will NOT build! Zig chokes on something. Can't understand
its error messages.

--
Duke
Details
Message ID
<CPCTJT4E1XLV.XCV7PQ6JIX2E@christoph-ThinkPad-E570>
In-Reply-To
<20220907163812.a461e5132f82c26257cce787@gmx.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Hi all,

unfortunately, I'm hitting the same errors [1] when trying to build aercbook
from master using zig 0.10.0.

Did anybody come up with a solution in the meantime?

Kind regards

Folker

[1] https://paste.sr.ht/~sfo/4ca43fee524433e5cd1fd4c3361ae8f5d7b26f17
Details
Message ID
<CPDGT6V4LX17.3JQWEW2S0M3E6@penguin>
In-Reply-To
<CPCTJT4E1XLV.XCV7PQ6JIX2E@christoph-ThinkPad-E570> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Hi,

Sorry, my bad! Zig currently is in heavy development and not everything
is stable yet. Regarding aercbook, I used to get away with pointing to
zig-0.9 as being the latest release but this doesn't work anymore.

A few days ago, I pushed the `zig-master` branch to the aercbook
repository which works with the current zig-master (zig-0.11).

I just pushed the `zig-0.10` branch which is a tiny back-port of
`zig-master` for the latest "stable" release of zig: zig-0.10. I
downloaded the binary zig-0.10 and verified that it works.

I'll update the README soon and probably also merge `zig-0.10` into
`master` to keep aercbook working with zig-releases, while trying to
keep up to date with potential future changes in zig or its standard
library in the `zig-master` branch. Might even set up a CI job to get
notified when zig master might introduce a breaking change.

Hope the zig-0.10 branch helps!

Best, 
Rene


_______________________________________________________________________
On Tue Dec 27, 2022 at 7:41 PM CET, Folker Schwesinger wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> unfortunately, I'm hitting the same errors [1] when trying to build
> aercbook
> from master using zig 0.10.0.
>
> Did anybody come up with a solution in the meantime?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Folker
>
> [1] https://paste.sr.ht/~sfo/4ca43fee524433e5cd1fd4c3361ae8f5d7b26f17
Details
Message ID
<CPEDPAQWJETG.37XSE4JWNY2DA@christoph-ThinkPad-E570>
In-Reply-To
<CPDGT6V4LX17.3JQWEW2S0M3E6@penguin> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Hi Rene,

thanks to your efforts I was able to build aercbook using zig-0.10 from
the master branch.

Thank you!


On Wed Dec 28, 2022 at 1:55 PM CET, Rene Schallner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, my bad! Zig currently is in heavy development and not everything
> is stable yet. Regarding aercbook, I used to get away with pointing to
> zig-0.9 as being the latest release but this doesn't work anymore.
>
> A few days ago, I pushed the `zig-master` branch to the aercbook
> repository which works with the current zig-master (zig-0.11).
>
> I just pushed the `zig-0.10` branch which is a tiny back-port of
> `zig-master` for the latest "stable" release of zig: zig-0.10. I
> downloaded the binary zig-0.10 and verified that it works.
>
> I'll update the README soon and probably also merge `zig-0.10` into
> `master` to keep aercbook working with zig-releases, while trying to
> keep up to date with potential future changes in zig or its standard
> library in the `zig-master` branch. Might even set up a CI job to get
> notified when zig master might introduce a breaking change.
>
> Hope the zig-0.10 branch helps!
>
> Best, 
> Rene
>
Details
Message ID
<CR1C59CFH45Z.36GR5ZKHOX3C7@fembook>
In-Reply-To
<CPDGT6V4LX17.3JQWEW2S0M3E6@penguin> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
On Wed Dec 28, 2022 at 7:55 AM EST, Rene Schallner wrote:
> I just pushed the `zig-0.10` branch which is a tiny back-port of
> `zig-master` for the latest "stable" release of zig: zig-0.10. I
> downloaded the binary zig-0.10 and verified that it works.

Thank you for the work! Can you also make it into a new release please?
I'm trying to publish this on the Alpine Linux package repository
(aports), and the request just got rejected for not using an actual
release:

https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/44920#note_295168

Coco
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)