~rockorager

St. Paul, MN

https://timculverhouse.com/

~rockorager/offmap

Last active 33 minutes ago

~rockorager/tcell-term

Last active 13 days ago

~rockorager/go-jmap-devel

Last active 3 months ago

~rockorager/go-jmap-announce

Last active 3 months ago

~rockorager/public-inbox

Last active 6 months ago
View more

Recent activity

Re: [PATCH offmap v2 1/2] chore: upgrade License to GPLv3 40 minutes ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rockorager/offmap

On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 2:07 PM CST, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Poldrack <git@moritz.sh>
> ---

I'll apply 1/2 of this series and the linting series for now. We can continue
discussion on the REUSE topic, but let's at least get the right license in here
ASAP.

Re: [PATCH offmap v2 2/2] chore: ensure REUSE compliance 49 minutes ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rockorager/offmap

On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 2:07 PM CST, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> Link: https://reuse.software
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Poldrack <git@moritz.sh>
> ---

Ok I've given this one more thought and really think we shouldn't be putting
copyright notices on things like docs and such. I always resort to what the
kernel does, and they have the SPDX identifiers in *most* source files, but not
docs. They also don't include any copyright notice.

That said, it still seems way overkill to me, even on source files. Tons of much
larger, more important projects use a single LICENSE file and call it a day.

I really think we should just stick to the LICENSE file at this point.

Re: [PATCH aerc v2 5/5] logging: rename package to log 5 hours ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rjarry/aerc-devel

On Sun Nov 27, 2022 at 6:32 AM CST, Robin Jarry wrote:
> Use the same name than the builtin "log" package. That way, we do not
> risk logging in the wrong place.
>
> Suggested-by: Tim Culverhouse <tim@timculverhouse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry <robin@jarry.cc>
> ---

I can't get this to apply on master :/. I wanted to test it out but there are a
million conflicts with the rename. I am ok giving up on the rename - it's not
*that* important, just a convenience. Up to you!

--
Tim

Re: [PATCH offmap v2 2/2] chore: ensure REUSE compliance 8 hours ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rockorager/offmap

On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 2:07 PM CST, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> Link: https://reuse.software
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Poldrack <git@moritz.sh>
> ---

It's because of the docs. scdoc files can't start with a comment. Is there a way
around that with the reuse linter?

Re: [PATCH offmap v2 2/2] chore: ensure REUSE compliance 9 hours ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rockorager/offmap

On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 2:07 PM CST, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> Link: https://reuse.software
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Poldrack <git@moritz.sh>
> ---

This one breaks `make`:

	scdoc < doc/offmap.1.scd | gzip > offmap.1.gz
	Error at 1:2: Name characters must be A-Z, a-z, 0-9, `-`, `_`, or `.`
	scdoc < doc/offmap.5.scd | gzip > offmap.5.gz
	Error at 1:2: Name characters must be A-Z, a-z, 0-9, `-`, `_`, or `.`

Also can we switch to SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-only?

Re: [PATCH offmap 2/2] ci: add REUSE licensing linter 11 hours ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rockorager/offmap

On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 9:23 AM CST,  wrote:
> From: Moritz Poldrack <git@moritz.sh>
>
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Poldrack <git@moritz.sh>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Tim Culverhouse <tim@timculverhouse.com>

Re: [PATCH offmap 1/2] ci: add code-linting step 11 hours ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rockorager/offmap

On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 9:23 AM CST,  wrote:
> From: Moritz Poldrack <git@moritz.sh>
>
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Poldrack <git@moritz.sh>
> ---

Looks good! I'll apply after the licensing updates.

Reviewed-by: Tim Culverhouse <tim@timculverhouse.com>

Re: [PATCH offmap 2/2] chore: ensure REUSE compliance 11 hours ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rockorager/offmap

On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 1:07 PM CST, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 7:49 PM CET, Tim Culverhouse wrote:
> > I agree, but this seems really complicated to have 3 licenses covering this
> > thing.
>
> I don't know how it is for you, but usually I don't really take the
> Licenses into account at all while working. They are the icing on the
> cake and usually nobody has an issue if you don't credit everyone in the
> binary as it is technically required.
>
> So to paraphrase:
> - it does not hinder work
> - we can use things as required
> - it's actually not complicated:

Re: [PATCH offmap 2/2] chore: ensure REUSE compliance 12 hours ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rockorager/offmap

On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 11:48 AM CST, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 2:52 PM CET, Tim Culverhouse wrote:
> > Why do we need CC0?
> Because GPL seems overkill for a gitignore, and by default the GPL would
> apply even to the gitignore file, the Readme, and the go.sum file.

I agree, but this seems really complicated to have 3 licenses covering this
thing.

> > I also think inclusion of the GFDL is a little overkill? I
> > don't know that I've ever seen a project use it.
> It's basically purpose-built GPL. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0PKG5-t3zU

See above.

Re: [PATCH offmap] imap/update: replace delimiters when syncing email 13 hours ago

From Tim Culverhouse to ~rockorager/offmap

On Wed Nov 30, 2022 at 11:47 AM CST, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> Tested-by: Moritz Poldrack <moritz@poldrack.dev>
> -- 
> Moritz Poldrack
> https://moritz.sh

Applied!

Thanks