From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On 2022-05-30 20:02, Drew DeVault wrote: > Can you send a patch for this (using CSS, the <del> element is still > semantically correct)? Done: https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev/patches/32617 ~Kunal
From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev
Browsers usually render a <del> tag with a strike-through. However, strike-through makes the number of deletions in a file unreadable as well as the number of additions is rendered with an underline. This commit fixes the issue by using underline for the <del> tag. --- scss/main.scss | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/scss/main.scss b/scss/main.scss index b41d4ff..86824c5 100644 --- a/scss/main.scss +++ b/scss/main.scss @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ dt { overflow-wrap: break-word; [message trimmed]
From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
Hi all, I've noticed that the number of deletions in a file when browsing a commit diff has a strike-through which can make it hard to parse (for example [1]). Going by the HTML, it seems like a <del> tag is used which by default renders with a strike-through on browsers [2]. Can I recommend removing the strike-through and replacing with an underline just like the number of additions? It would be more consistent and also more readable. ~Kunal --- [1]: https://files.catbox.moe/wk62by.png
From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On 2022-05-05 00:09, witcher@wiredspace.de wrote: > Is it possible to use command substitution in build manifests? I'm > specifically thinking about checking formatting of go code with > `test -z $(gofmt -l **/*.go)`. > It seems to me like this is not possible, as the output of `gofmt` > doesn't seem to be passed to `test -z`. > > Is there an alternative for this? > > Thanks. I'm not sure about command substitution, but have you tried using the GNU find program? Something like `find . -name "*.go"` should work (though I can't say for sure as I haven't tested it myself).
From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
Sorry, but I don't think this is a supported or planned feature for sr.ht. I don't wish to put words in Drew's mouth, but I believe he feels strongly against such features (features that "gamify" development in his eyes). Sincerely, Kunal On 4/28/22 16:19, Matěj Cepl wrote: > GitHub has very useful network view of the repository which shows all > clones of the current repository, e.g., > https://github.com/martanne/vis/network . How to get something similar > for https://git.sr.ht/~martanne/vis ? >
From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On 12/7/21 22:21, Drew DeVault wrote: > You want curl -d, not curl -D, I think. > Wow. That's an embarrassing mistake. Thanks for having keener eyes than I have! ~Kunal
From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On 12/7/21 21:53, Drew DeVault wrote: > On Tue Dec 7, 2021 at 9:23 AM CET, Kunal Sareen wrote: >> curl --oauth2-bearer '<secret>' \ >> -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ >> -D '{ "query": "mutation { unpublish(domain: $dom) {version} }", >> "variables": { "dom": "samu.srht.site" } }' \ >> https://pages.sr.ht/query Apologies. I noticed there was a typo when I sent the email -- it should read: ``` curl --oauth2-bearer '<secret>' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
Hi, I'm having a lot of trouble unpublishing a website. I'm not terribly familiar with GraphQL (this first time using it). I /think/ I followed the query syntax correctly as here [1], but I still get a "operation not found" error. I used the following curl command to unpublish: ``` curl --oauth2-bearer '<secret>' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -D '{ "query": "mutation { unpublish(domain: $dom) {version} }", "variables": { "dom": "samu.srht.site" } }' \ https://pages.sr.ht/query
From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On 10/8/21 16:07, Kunal Sareen wrote: > On 10/8/21 16:03, Evan Boehs wrote: >> I considered this and it is surely the best option for now, but it >> requires syncing between browsers and bookmarks are generally clunky > Hi Evan, > > I think it is Drew's policy to not add features that "gamify" > development (such as "stars" etc.). There have been multiple discussions > on this mailing list about this topic. > > ~Kunal A potential alternative could be to have favourite repositories but not have the "star" feature or total stars visible. That is, the favourite
From Kunal Sareen to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On 10/8/21 16:03, Evan Boehs wrote: > I considered this and it is surely the best option for now, but it > requires syncing between browsers and bookmarks are generally clunky Hi Evan, I think it is Drew's policy to not add features that "gamify" development (such as "stars" etc.). There have been multiple discussions on this mailing list about this topic. ~Kunal