Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com
Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (mail-40134.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.134])
	by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3272311EE04
	for <~sircmpwn/hare-users@lists.sr.ht>; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:37:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:36:54 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
	s=protonmail3; t=1674733028; x=1674992228;
	bh=lD/xmG7E+dx9zv0P0Z9M4cuKcs9cuTtSIq88NKsDpRw=;
	h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
	 Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:
	 Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
	b=V9A7PzLiBCi/Boszd7H8ypgJ+/ugIjz7E/qQVh88LvGSc4tQ7SVZNlzP2F0TvZ8lV
	 lfYOef58gRZuQkc5On77SGCSEJIHDHQuTPd1mcCK/IKcpLlAwc+syb957PlS7oHjol
	 lxSpRLPnm2RCLGUEuqZdOEP4AYf5X9LvTSnjm8x176zE+WX+j1R4p3ISvaspGibwK8
	 6u+m97cyJF+jasyasfEAgh4nCPs/pRJV76OdqjGAOt1MxDGfTpxvXRBujdcSvOf3Xy
	 Jqa7JDXbmyu5pudtWAyr9+8a3Qc20TywqEfwHKzD156Y3ATRw+gEG2dGxGY9KLF0oQ
	 16Rr3DLQ2SEwg==
To: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
From: KAAtheWise <KAAtheWise@protonmail.com>
Cc: "~sircmpwn/hare-users@lists.sr.ht" <~sircmpwn/hare-users@lists.sr.ht>
Subject: Re: Using append with type aliases
Message-ID: <PVIDBM4bOrVGP_hwy9c6kECZ_iFWt5iqgcnYNpYd1FvJ8CGdKaK2sJHUSKp689UremZJmJAS5srSDPSUaDhz0SQ8AyfmaHrc4M1CqqowYAI=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CQ22UE5JBFGO.35G5EKI79XLFX@taiga>
References: <cQ18QLphlVx7iH9N9bY-TocynQ71uPr5JqQGnkgvXoFa4vJX0tXhY4xZU57zx8chQNlfG7X12tLcyuNkpdNp0E54GFOsGjdpEc30beh5Zr4=@protonmail.com> <CQ22UE5JBFGO.35G5EKI79XLFX@taiga>
Feedback-ID: 42509552:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Apologies, I confused myself.  The error in my code was elsewhere, I
mixed up the var name for the type name.

I did some testing, "slice type" from spec refers to any type alias for
a slice type no matter the nesting, right?