~sircmpwn/public-inbox

1

BARE variable width integers

Details
Message ID
<36f034dd-6f33-4019-aad2-0013c99571f1@pixelhero.dev>
DKIM signature
fail
Download raw message
DKIM signature: fail
Hi,

What is the reasoning behind limiting variable width integers to 64 bit? 
Is this for consistency with other types and to reduce the scope of BARE, 
with the expectation being that anything needed larger sizes shouldn't be 
using this format?

- Noam Preil
Details
Message ID
<C67UBNHRPVR6.JZCKNWWTNXYR@homura>
In-Reply-To
<36f034dd-6f33-4019-aad2-0013c99571f1@pixelhero.dev> (view parent)
DKIM signature
fail
Download raw message
DKIM signature: fail
It's the largest commonly available integer size and avoids having to
implicate a bigint library for most implementations.
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)