<4n3eaw4i5vpfaa4qtvv66jchrsa4lhgz5s6phac3sx4z3nlby3@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Hi! https://lists.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/snappy-tools/%3Chyotf6ddsxe62gnybwuvd2wsegkdibj4luca47geniyghffywo%40tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz%3E says DKIM signature: missing but simultaneously https://lists.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/snappy-tools/%3Chyotf6ddsxe62gnybwuvd2wsegkdibj4luca47geniyghffywo%40tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz%3E/raw says Authentication-Results: mail-a.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=nabijaczleweli.xyz header.i=@nabijaczleweli.xyz and the message both (a) has a DKIM signature, and (b) it's valid. Best, наб
<87sf1tiifs.fsf@city17.xyz>
<4n3eaw4i5vpfaa4qtvv66jchrsa4lhgz5s6phac3sx4z3nlby3@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz>
(view parent)
> https://lists.sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/snappy-tools/%3Chyotf6ddsxe62gnybwuvd2wsegkdibj4luca47geniyghffywo%40tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz%3E > says [DKIM signature: missing] but simultaneously says > Authentication-Results: mail-a.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=nabijaczleweli.xyz header.i=@nabijaczleweli.xyz > and the message both (a) has a DKIM signature, and (b) it's valid. Possibly related to? https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss/%3C52144466-B4C1-43A1-919C-59B827950C1B%40startmail.com%3E
<qtu6jd536t6lhexsciz52vv4p2vszsy7gu2qrzfrmdxcx4nlwo@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz>
<87sf1tiifs.fsf@city17.xyz>
(view parent)
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 09:23:58PM +0100, jman wrote: > Possibly related to? > https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss/%3C52144466-B4C1-43A1-919C-59B827950C1B%40startmail.com%3E Probably not, given that that thread terminates with > the fixed version of go-msgauth has been deployed on sr.ht and $ opendkim-testmsg < raw $ ./dkim-verify < raw 2024/02/15 21:42:33 Valid signature for nabijaczleweli.xyz with go-msgauth 0.6.8, 0.6.7, and 0.6.6.
<FOpOAsY7GbEQ-A_piTllwlJMEkvFOlJyGIGADkIGfruAfO9Mje0VRPkVNMknKQL-Gc8haf27jus_SVrCwczpFH2NgE4ieuEW3nJaRqN9NqM=@emersion.fr>
<qtu6jd536t6lhexsciz52vv4p2vszsy7gu2qrzfrmdxcx4nlwo@tarta.nabijaczleweli.xyz>
(view parent)
Should be fixed now.