Authentication-Results: mail-b.sr.ht; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.mx header.i=@posteo.mx Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.66]) by mail-b.sr.ht (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97F2911EF54 for <~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss@lists.sr.ht>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 04:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AAFD24023D for <~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss@lists.sr.ht>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 05:57:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.mx; s=2017; t=1615093057; bh=2znvwxcyK4A97RvEzTJYmLcJFycAQsHN2AB9cI437oI=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:From; b=LSi16n9LzQzoenXcuSLuIRoSIITdclOq/dqO3qfShVvXEMKtqj59kZuGFQIuxPwSR XjQ1YAtGhn39QmLCr5CvhNs9aLjaMhj/6wKSImt8WwCky+Loz3b7nqUrlBq747tl3Q UinD3btRlKZ+ne/QeXI0RI1l56FH8N+dkJXOYocVsYJWoeNRinlCbw0N0IwkQgyKw6 1RjJOvnu2X4yQygbH2GSxUwhh8CJ/IpkA9Ur9H0/l21E0bXap3rkXYNMPtlWIKh1kk WL6wsaqfge7GIBfYptrYEb2zC6PDlp5CEXC3WPd536eCLos2pc/9c3v2OmhQwHAv8D OA5Sd9zVV9X6g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4DtTjq57Djz6tm8; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 05:57:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5358daf4af53c154650dee206d6a29dc0c450672.camel@posteo.mx> Subject: Re: [pages] Behaviour of Links From: "u9000 (Nine)" To: webmaster@coolguy.website, ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss@lists.sr.ht Cc: Drew DeVault Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 23:57:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (by Flathub.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sun, 2021-03-07 at 17:30 +1300, Zach! wrote: >  > Can you be more specific about which pages demonstrate the problem? > > Sure! I made an example page to show the issue, and tested it on > firefox, chrome, and safari. It is the same behaviour across the board. > > check out: > https://solarpunk.cool/example > > And to audit the code: > https://git.sr.ht/~zim/solarpunk.cool/tree/canon/item/example seems to be the same as the code in the repo as well (although I only used my eyes). > As the page shows, relative links (whether for navigation, external > stylesheets, or images) do not work as expected. Only absolute paths > work. Also, links that open in a new tab do not work. I tested it in lynx, elinks, and w3m. All of them worked with the _blank links, which means it's probably an issue with a more modern feature of HTTP. -- u9000 (Nine) They, Them, Theirs