~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

10 4

Problems posting patches to lists.sr.ht

Details
Message ID
<CKUXVQLCARGO.22HF4EYYM50SF@Archetype>
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
I have encountered some issue sending a patch series to lists.sr.ht

It first happened when 2 days ago a patch series was incomplete[0] and
the last part didn't show up (my attempt to just forward the patch from
my mailbox certainly didn't help).

That time the issue was "fixed" by just sending it again, but that's not
really a solution. Since it happened again today[1] I was curious if
other people have experienced something similar. I tried sending the
same message again (I wrote down the headers this time) and it was just
dropped without any response again.

My mailserver logs don't show any error[2].

[0]: https://lists.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc-devel/%3C20220618101917.399233-1-moritz%40poldrack.dev%3E
[1]: https://lists.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc-devel/%3C20220620082222.196328-1-moritz%40poldrack.dev%3E
[2]: https://paste.sr.ht/~poldi1405/ceabb2fc2e86379fbebf1011961a78fe7152a4ab
--
Moritz Poldrack
https://moritz.sh
Details
Message ID
<CKUZHWUXGRNK.3ITL97355N589@Archetype>
In-Reply-To
<CKUXVQLCARGO.22HF4EYYM50SF@Archetype> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
I just received word from one of the mailinglist subscribers that they
did receive 4/4. Even less of an explanation as to why it doesn't show
on the webUI
Details
Message ID
<CKV7Z28LBUZB.DH01209ZDSAD@Archetype>
In-Reply-To
<CKUZHWUXGRNK.3ITL97355N589@Archetype> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
Another funny detail: It's included in the mbox export:
https://lists.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc-devel/%3C20220620082222.196328-1-moritz%40poldrack.dev%3E/mbox
--
Moritz Poldrack
https://moritz.sh
Details
Message ID
<CKVII46E34D3.296K2UMW36G32@nix>
In-Reply-To
<CKV7Z28LBUZB.DH01209ZDSAD@Archetype> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
On Mon Jun 20, 2022 at 9:47 PM +0200, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> Another funny detail: It's included in the mbox export:
> https://lists.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc-devel/%3C20220620082222.196328-1-moritz%40poldrack.dev%3E/mbox

FWIW it's not limited to patches, I posted this in sr.ht-dev
two months ago <CCJJWBWPYJRHH.P27EGATOLHJR@nix> and no one
seemed to know why either.

On Tue Apr 26, 2022 at 1:45 PM KST, Nguyễn Gia Phong wrote:
> Case in point: [0] vs [1].  This message is also available
> in the archive at [2].  I wonder if this has been reported before
> and if I should file a ticket for it.
>
> [0] https://lists.sr.ht/~cnx/blackshades/<e4f806dc-96b6-403d-92c4-bf534834e3a2@icculus.org>/raw
> [1] https://lists.sr.ht/~cnx/blackshades/<e4f806dc-96b6-403d-92c4-bf534834e3a2@icculus.org>
> [2] https://lists.sr.ht/~cnx/blackshades
Details
Message ID
<CKVM3XXEKRNU.38O4WMNPNDL8N@Archetype>
In-Reply-To
<CKVII46E34D3.296K2UMW36G32@nix> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
On Tue Jun 21, 2022 at 6:02 AM CEST, Nguyễn Gia Phong wrote:
> FWIW it's not limited to patches, I posted this in sr.ht-dev
> two months ago <CCJJWBWPYJRHH.P27EGATOLHJR@nix> and no one
> seemed to know why either.

Glad to know I'm not the only one, but not great that we don't know the
cause…
Details
Message ID
<93b7a604-eeaf-0cab-3e06-423ce971ae1d@bitfehler.net>
In-Reply-To
<CKVM3XXEKRNU.38O4WMNPNDL8N@Archetype> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
I am trying to reproduce this locally by importing the mbox files, but 
so far I cannot, everything looks just fine.

Moritz, can you confirm though that this actually looks allright? I 
couldn't see anything missing there:

https://lists.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc-devel/%3C20220620082222.196328-1-moritz%40poldrack.dev%3E

As for 
https://lists.sr.ht/~cnx/blackshades/<e4f806dc-96b6-403d-92c4-bf534834e3a2@icculus.org>, 
I have no clue so far. Renders fine in my local instance. I'll keep 
poking it...

Cheers,
Conrad
Details
Message ID
<CKWN0ZOD4TF3.2RL3D0PZWRZ5M@Archetype>
In-Reply-To
<93b7a604-eeaf-0cab-3e06-423ce971ae1d@bitfehler.net> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
On Wed Jun 22, 2022 at 1:29 PM CEST, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
> I am trying to reproduce this locally by importing the mbox files, but
> so far I cannot, everything looks just fine.
>
> Moritz, can you confirm though that this actually looks allright? I
> couldn't see anything missing there:
>
> https://lists.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc-devel/%3C20220620082222.196328-1-moritz%40poldrack.dev%3E

I looks like this now has all mails listed which it originally didn't.
Might be due to Tim's reply (just a guess though). One telling indicator
that something's off is that it's not recognised as a patch though and
that the CI pipeline was not triggert, which it usually is.
Details
Message ID
<CKWNQF1WNE0O.6U4IS6IK9FEK@TimBook-Arch>
In-Reply-To
<CKWN0ZOD4TF3.2RL3D0PZWRZ5M@Archetype> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
On Wed Jun 22, 2022 at 6:48 AM CDT, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
> I looks like this now has all mails listed which it originally didn't.
> Might be due to Tim's reply (just a guess though). One telling indicator
> that something's off is that it's not recognised as a patch though and
> that the CI pipeline was not triggert, which it usually is.

This doesn't show v4 4/4 for me. The messages for me show as:

[PATCH aerc v4 0/4]
[PATCH aerc v4 3/4]
[PATCH aerc v4 1/4]
[PATCH aerc v4 2/4]
Re: [PATCH aerc v4 4/4]
Details
Message ID
<dce21d16-82b3-7fe9-c12a-79c76266f25c@bitfehler.net>
In-Reply-To
<CKWNQF1WNE0O.6U4IS6IK9FEK@TimBook-Arch> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message

On 6/22/22 14:21, Tim Culverhouse wrote:
> On Wed Jun 22, 2022 at 6:48 AM CDT, Moritz Poldrack wrote:
>> One telling indicator that something's off is that it's not
>> recognised as a patch

Indeed.

> This doesn't show v4 4/4 for me.

Ack, I over-read the "Re:" of the 4/4 there.

Thanks, it seems there is more at play than just the specific emails. 
Both issues do not appear on my local import of the mbox file.

I'll dig further and will let you know if I find s/t
Details
Message ID
<59e7dffc-4ef4-2a2b-b7a3-3de38a319e36@bitfehler.net>
In-Reply-To
<CKWNQF1WNE0O.6U4IS6IK9FEK@TimBook-Arch> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
Quick update on this: we've identified one problem with thread 
assignment where mails arrive out of order. There is code to handle 
this, but it had some issues. A patch is in review. Note, however, that 
the patch only prevents this from happening in the future. We'll also 
need to write a script to fix the already broken threads (WIP).

This is definitely what happened with the Blackshades thread. Patches 
have a slightly different handling, I still need to check whether that 
was caused by the same issue or a different one.

Thanks for your patience, y'all. I'll keep you posted.

Cheers,
Conrad
Details
Message ID
<9934655c-3a76-7a59-28b8-5bed3ae5510b@bitfehler.net>
In-Reply-To
<59e7dffc-4ef4-2a2b-b7a3-3de38a319e36@bitfehler.net> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
On 6/24/22 19:11, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
> This is definitely what happened with the Blackshades thread. Patches 
> have a slightly different handling, I still need to check whether that 
> was caused by the same issue or a different one.

Well, turns out the reordering issue also fixes the patch detection. 
Even though I find that a bit curious, I'll just accept it and instead 
focus on writing something that fixes the already broken threads in the 
database.

Cheers,
Conrad
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)