Hi,
New here. I pushed a repo to git.sr.ht which has 2 branches, main and
usage, but only "main" shows up in the "refs" column of the repo summary
page. They both show up in the refs page though. Is this expected
behavior, or should they be auto-populated in the summary?
In case it matters, the "usage" branch doesn't have any upstream set.
The repo in question: https://git.sr.ht/~xxc3nsoredxx/stdc
- Oskari
On 23/03/26 02:17PM, Oskari Pirhonen wrote:
> New here. I pushed a repo to git.sr.ht which has 2 branches, main and> usage, but only "main" shows up in the "refs" column of the repo summary> page. They both show up in the refs page though. Is this expected> behavior, or should they be auto-populated in the summary?> > In case it matters, the "usage" branch doesn't have any upstream set.
The "refs" "column" on the "summary" page displays the master branch and the
latest tag. The "refs" page shows a list of all branches and all tags. Example:
https://git.sr.ht/~strahinja/tablehttps://git.sr.ht/~strahinja/table/refs
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 21:18:26 +0200, Drew DeVault wrote:
> Only the default branch shows in the summary page.
Alright.
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 21:39:14 +0200, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> On 23/03/26 02:17PM, Oskari Pirhonen wrote:> > New here. I pushed a repo to git.sr.ht which has 2 branches, main and> > usage, but only "main" shows up in the "refs" column of the repo summary> > page. They both show up in the refs page though. Is this expected> > behavior, or should they be auto-populated in the summary?> > > > In case it matters, the "usage" branch doesn't have any upstream set.> > The "refs" "column" on the "summary" page displays the master branch and the > latest tag. The "refs" page shows a list of all branches and all tags. Example: > > https://git.sr.ht/~strahinja/table> https://git.sr.ht/~strahinja/table/refs>
I hadn't pushed a tag yet, so it looked a bit empty with just the
default branch.
This clears things up, thanks.
- Oskari