~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

2 2

Re: The state of SourceHut and our plans for the future

Eleanor Clifford <eleanor@clifford.lol>
Details
Message ID
<n63mvpfianac7ckkrl2fqzxiecf4dz2zx734t3r7hjg76w6ivw@hzn7ae5i3ys7>
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
Drew DeVault wrote:
> A new blog post is available on sourcehut.org:
>
> The state of SourceHut and our plans for the future
> https://sourcehut.org/blog/2024-06-04-status-and-plans/

I am curious if you can share any further details around the servers
lost in the mail -- perhaps I have too much faith in society, but I
would have thought that failing to respond to a request for an insurance
claim would land a shipping provider in pretty deep water (perhaps a
lawsuit), particularly when the contents in question are worth a few
tens of thousands of dollars...

Best Wishes,
Ellie

-- 
All emails sent by me are cryptographically signed.
Trust signed mail normally, trust unsigned mail little.
Get key: `gpg --locate-keys eleanor@clifford.lol'

Re: The state of SourceHut and our plans for the future

Details
Message ID
<87sexsre71.fsf@city17.xyz>
In-Reply-To
<n63mvpfianac7ckkrl2fqzxiecf4dz2zx734t3r7hjg76w6ivw@hzn7ae5i3ys7> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
Thank you Drew for the long due update.
I hope that this second semester of 2024 will allow you to breathe and focus on the roadmap.
I hope and believe in the growth of Sourcehut. I hope it will become a place for a sustainable 
growth and a place able to attract and sustain talents.

> failing to respond to a request for an insurance claim would land a shipping provider in pretty 
> deep water

I'm not particularly interested in the details but I am sure Sourcehut did all they could to get 
their money back. It's a shame that sometimes you cannot right a wrong because you just don't have 
the resources for that (that's how I read the whole story).
 
A small nit: I received in my mailbox the opening message of this thread from Drew but I don't see 
it here:
https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss/%3Cn63mvpfianac7ckkrl2fqzxiecf4dz2zx734t3r7hjg76w6ivw@hzn7ae5i3ys7%3E

Re: The state of SourceHut and our plans for the future

Eleanor Clifford <eleanor@clifford.lol>
Details
Message ID
<jtmubogzussddra7biudemavvm4rmsj5okkczyffdmslkfzgqy@nk6l5ldrp4jf>
In-Reply-To
<87sexsre71.fsf@city17.xyz> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
jman wrote:
> [...] I am sure Sourcehut did all they could to get their money back.
> It's a shame that sometimes you cannot right a wrong because you just
> don't have the resources for that (that's how I read the whole story).

I agree completely, sorry if I accidentally implied otherwise -- I fully
trust that SourceHut has done everything in their power; I am just
surprised and disappointed in the shipping provider on SourceHut's behalf.

- Ellie

-- 
All emails sent by me are cryptographically signed.
Trust signed mail normally, trust unsigned mail little.
Get key: `gpg --locate-keys eleanor@clifford.lol'
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)