~sircmpwn/writefreesoftware.org

This thread contains a patchset. You're looking at the original emails, but you may wish to use the patch review UI. Review patch
1

[PATCH v2] Fix typos

Details
Message ID
<20230520003835.907566-1-piotr@maslowski.xyz>
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
Patch: +2 -2
---
Changes in v2:
- Instead of de-duplicating 'get' say 'can get'
- Change commit message accordingly

Yeah, this is what happens when I blindly write the patches a day later.

Btw, making it a v2 *and* changing the subject feels weird. Is that how
it is supposed to be done or should I have gone about differently?
(maybe using In-Reply-To would make sense here?)

---
 content/learn/licenses.md                  | 2 +-
 content/learn/participate/derived-works.md | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/content/learn/licenses.md b/content/learn/licenses.md
index 67e6e80..01e552d 100644
--- a/content/learn/licenses.md
+++ b/content/learn/licenses.md
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ on. Otherwise:
To understand your obligations under any particular license, you will have to
read it (and perhaps consult a lawyer, especially if you represent a business).
However, most free software licenses have some traits in common with others, and
you get get a simple understanding of them by learning about a few essential
you can get a simple understanding of them by learning about a few essential
traits. Here are some common features of free software licenses:

### Attribution
diff --git a/content/learn/participate/derived-works.md b/content/learn/participate/derived-works.md
index d135a50..1e5b082 100644
--- a/content/learn/participate/derived-works.md
+++ b/content/learn/participate/derived-works.md
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ into anything with relatively little obligation towards the copyright holders.
Most permissive licenses require only that you include the license text, or even
just a copyright statement, in your product. For free software projects which
incorporate permissively licensed code into their work, meeting these
obligations is is usually as straightforward as including an additional license
obligations is usually as straightforward as including an additional license
with your source code.

When incorporating permissively licensed free software into non-free works, you
--
Best regards,
Piotr Masłowski
Details
Message ID
<CSR7MOP154BG.12IMFK6IGGKVP@taiga>
In-Reply-To
<20230520003835.907566-1-piotr@maslowski.xyz> (view parent)
DKIM signature
pass
Download raw message
Thanks!

To git@git.sr.ht:~sircmpwn/writefreesoftware.org
   a12bec9..b8e64ee  master -> master

On Sat May 20, 2023 at 2:38 AM CEST, Piotr Masłowski wrote:
> Btw, making it a v2 *and* changing the subject feels weird. Is that how
> it is supposed to be done or should I have gone about differently?
> (maybe using In-Reply-To would make sense here?)

That's not an issue -- and you should indeed start a new thread.
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)