Breda
From Geert Stappers to ~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc
Some minor changes in comment lines Reported-by: Gary R. Schmidt <grschmidt@acm.org> --- trust-anchors.conf | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/trust-anchors.conf b/trust-anchors.conf index 1a7de74..e8bacf4 100644 --- a/trust-anchors.conf +++ b/trust-anchors.conf @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # The root DNSSEC trust anchor, valid as at 18/07/2024 [message trimmed]
From Geert Stappers to ~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc
From: Loganaden Velvindron <logan@cyberstorm.mu> Signed-off-by: Loganaden Velvindron <logan@cyberstorm.mu> Signed-off-by: Jaykishan Mutkawoa <jay@cyberstorm.mu> --- trust-anchors.conf | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/trust-anchors.conf b/trust-anchors.conf index 2a1e2a0..1a7de74 100644 --- a/trust-anchors.conf +++ b/trust-anchors.conf @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ # The root DNSSEC trust anchor, valid as at 11/01/2019 [message trimmed]
From Geert Stappers to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 05:46:04PM +0000, builds.sr.ht wrote: > todo.sr.ht/patches/alpine.yml: FAILED in 1m0s > [search.py: Fix `submitter:me` queries][0] v2 from [Johannes Maibaum][1] > ✗ #1312302 FAILED todo.sr.ht/patches/alpine.yml https://builds.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/job/1312302 Line https://builds.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/job/1312302#task-package-325 has setuptools.extern.packaging.version.InvalidVersion: Invalid version: '0.75.16_git20240826' Where to change that version number? Groeten Geert Stappers --
From Geert Stappers to ~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc
Another 17th of the month, another "picking up the patches" Previous-Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Ensure resize_packet() does not overflow header In-Reply-To: <20240513020401.841150-1-dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com> ( https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2024q2/017572.html ) On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:04:01AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: > This is a "fix" for OSV-2022-785 (oss-fuzz automated report that > apparently hasn't been looked into) > > It really is a redundant safety in case something goes wrong when > finding pheader: the only caller of resize_packet() with a pheader are
From Geert Stappers to ~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc
From: Marek Skrobacki via Dnsmasq-discuss <dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk>
If the DHCP server is running inside a container or behind a load
balancer, the DHCPREQUEST arriving at dnsmasq for processing may have a
Server ID (option 54) configured with an IP address that is not assigned
to the local interface. In this case, dnsmasq will check if the 'Server
Identifier Override' option was set in the incoming packet.
- If it was not set, the packet is dropped.
- If it was set, dnsmasq evaluates the Server ID against the value
provided in 'Server ID Override' suboption 11, as outlined in RFC5107.
In both cases, there is no match against the 'backend' IP address
configured on the interface. This results in the DHCPNAK being returned
[message trimmed]
From Geert Stappers to ~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc
From: Erik Karlsson <erik.karlsson@iopsys.eu> Not doing so can result in a use after free since the name for DHCP derived DNS records is represented as a pointer into the DHCP lease table. Update will only happen when necessary since lease_update_dns tests internally on dns_dirty and the force argument is zero. Signed-off-by: Erik Karlsson <erik.karlsson@iopsys.eu> --- src/dnsmasq.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/src/dnsmasq.c b/src/dnsmasq.c index a9f26ae..1be3b82 100644 [message trimmed]
From Geert Stappers to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 03:43:34PM -0400, Geoff Beier wrote: Subject: Re: Article about flaws of Sourcehut > When I read that article, my initial reaction is that I hope there's not > much change in response to that, or that any change is purely additive, > in the sense of letting project owners choose alternate workflows. It > seems OK that different workflows are better for different projects, > and that one forge might fit a particular project's needs better > than another. > > I hope it's not dragging this thread too far off-topic to ask, though: > is sourcehut doing OK? I'm certainly still happy using it, and it's > been stable and very nice to use from my perspective. > > I've noticed two things that make me want to hear an update on how
From Geert Stappers to ~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> The make target 'install-common' expects results from the target 'all'. A 'make -j install' may fail because both targets are brought up-to-todate in parallel. As a result the final binary will not exist at the time 'install-common' runs, because 'all' is not yet done. Adjust the dependencies to update 'all' before processing 'install-common'. Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> --- Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) [message trimmed]
From Geert Stappers to ~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc
Hi, Another 17th of month, another attempt to prevent that patches fall through the cracks. At https://lists.sr.ht/~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc/patches is 1 pending patch, "Quieten DHCPv6 log when in static mode. My plan is to keep it warm for two months. Checking the archive learnt me that some patches haven't yet reached the "mailinglist patch collector". Such as "Fix dependency in make install target". See email 2024-03-17.
From Geert Stappers to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 12:38:16AM -0500, Ren Kararou wrote: > It appears that git.sr.ht is currently returning 504 on the web > interface. > > Is anyone else experiencing this? https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/git.sr.ht?proto=https Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse