~toastal/github-less-social

This thread contains a patchset. You're looking at the original emails, but you may wish to use the patch review UI. Review patch
2 2

[PATCH 0/1] remove brave mention

Details
Message ID
<20230829133941.3003-1-jackson@jacksonchen666.com>
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
I'd suggest not using Brave browser, since the CEO supports a ban on
same-sex marriage[0], plus Brave browser is actually just reskinned Google
Chrome (technically it's Chromium, which Brave and Google Chrome is based
off of).

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich#Appointment_to_CEO_and_resignation
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_(web_browser)

Jackson Chen (1):
  remove brave mention

 README.adoc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.42.0

[PATCH 1/1] remove brave mention

Details
Message ID
<20230829133941.3003-2-jackson@jacksonchen666.com>
In-Reply-To
<20230829133941.3003-1-jackson@jacksonchen666.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Patch: +1 -1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich#Appointment_to_CEO_and_resignation
---
 README.adoc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.adoc b/README.adoc
index a756f6e..4673e08 100644
--- a/README.adoc
+++ b/README.adoc
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ For a more aggressive option (hides more upsell items & is more likely to hide t

Additionally I have a user style @ `https://git.sr.ht/~toastal/github-less-social/blob/trunk/styles.css` that will tone down some of the bright colors like those from avatars and emoji (but will show color on hover).

WARNING: Don’t use Google Chrome. Firefox, LibreWolf, Mullvad, Brave, and all the others are a better option. If you’re concerned about ads, you should be aware that Google’s entire browser is adware.
WARNING: Don’t use Google Chrome. Firefox, LibreWolf, Mullvad, and all the others are a better option. If you’re concerned about ads, you should be aware that Google’s entire browser is adware.

== License

-- 
2.42.0
Details
Message ID
<178036ec44d4fc95.d76d113760e08779.8e1cf8445e5aa2d4@lavash>
In-Reply-To
<20230829133941.3003-1-jackson@jacksonchen666.com> (view parent)
DKIM signature
missing
Download raw message
Hey. Thanks for the interest, but I think I’m going to have to rejct
this request, & I’d actually like to explain my reasoning:

First, Brave is not a perfect browser & it *is* last on this incomplete 
list for a reason, but I feel it still has a place. Brave is well-known
to be based on the Blink+V8 engines behind Chromium, but the reality is
that we have web sites & web apps that are denying users based on
whether or not they have a Chromium-compatible user agent or similar.
Anecdotally, I have loved ones with such requirements for work. There 
has to be *some* browser in this space that can fit the bill for users 
while having a privacy focus. Brave has a pretty solid built-in
ad/tracking blocker on by default with little input needed for the user.
It’s source is released under MPL-2.0 unlike say Vivaldi which is closed
& also has some ad blocking but do we know what they allow thru (think
AdBlock Plus’s “acceptable ads”) as a unfree software? As far the Brave 
team has posted, they want to resist Chrome-doms (such as Web 
Environment Integrity, some of the bad Web Manifest V3 changes, etc.). 
They’ve also addressed some past faults like inserting referral codes. 
Even despite riding a crypto wave, the tech sphere was following it 
before the ‘normie’ hype because flawed or not, the intent of even BAT 
is to address some obvious issues with the current ad-based model a 
lot of the web is built in (whether or not you agree with it is a
personal matter without having the benefit yet of hindsight). Enabling 
such features as the ad replacement/ad notifications isn’t even on by 
default. What I really see is a browser whose team is genuinely trying 
to do its best to balance the privacy wants from its users & the 
ecosystem/profit requirements to exist in our capitalist society. …Just 
like how Mozilla largely has to suckle at Google to keep the lights on.

I am not sure of an alternative in the Chromium space that can support a
user that has requirements a site/app has put on them to use a
compatible browser—an alternative that has the eyes & team behind
managing a fork of one of the largest pieces of software, Chromium.

As for Eich, man did a bad thing …but did a bad thing almost a decade
ago & has dealt with the ramifications, including getting fired. I’m 
usually in favor of boycotts against corporations, products, 
organizations that do bad, but canceling an individual, I’m a bit less
fond of as there should be room for atonement. I would honestly doubt 
he does much in the way of making decisions about the browser itself—
there is likely a CTO, but largely decisions are probably made by a 
development team actually calling shots—but our messiah worship of CEOs 
as a result of the capilist society thrust upon us is giving them too 
much power & celebrity that I would rather just not bother caring about. 
In the same way I wouldn’t stop using a service because a janitor made a 
bigoted post online a decade age, there are more workers on that team & 
their work shouldn’t be viewed thru the lens of CEO as if he (or Bezos, or 
Musk, or Zuckerberg, or Gates, et al. other clowns) is the genius 
mastermind of his team’s labor.

--
toastal ไข่ดาว | https://toast.al
Reply to thread Export thread (mbox)