Last active 4 months ago
View more

Recent activity

Re: Public API usage 3 months ago

From Ted Reed to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Gabriel Fontes <eu@misterio.me> writes:

> Actually, this is not for a specific host, but for a repository "kind". For
> example, the "gitlab" type works for any and all gitlab instances. That's why i
> personally think sourcehut makes more sense than srht, as this refers to the
> software, not the specific instance.
> [...]
> The shorthand syntax is kind of a bonus that comes from implementing a "type",
> and it just defaults to the official instance.

Oh, that's really neat. I've been trying to wait for stabilization

Re: Public API usage 3 months ago

From Ted Reed to ~sircmpwn/sr.ht-discuss

Nguyễn Gia Phong <mcsinyx@disroot.org> writes:

> What is wrong with the current argument if I may ask?  While sr.ht
> seems to be the only public instance at the moment, SourceHut
> is free software and the maintainers encourage hosting it, so a redirect
> from sourcehut scheme to *.sr.ht would not make sense.  Plus, hg is also
> supported.

My understanding(*) is that usually the project is called Sourcehut and
this particular instance is called sr.ht, so perhaps srht: would make
more sense as a shortcut prefix?

I'm sure there are other instances, and likely will be many more in the