Drew DeVault wrote:
> 
> https://sourcehut.org/blog/2019-11-15-sourcehut-1-year-alpha/

> Maturation of hg.sr.ht into a competitive Hg hosting service

Hear, hear! High time!

I also would like to see a HG-based wiki. 

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Drew DeVault wrote:
> It would be possible in theory to add hg support, but it needs some hg
> experts to draft a design doc for the hg.sr.ht API.

Unfortunately I'm no hg expert, just a happy hg user with an aversion to git.

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Humaid AlQassimi wrote:
> So maybe try https://man.sr.ht as a notes platform if you haven't, 

Is it correct that a wiki can only be created in a git repo, and not in a hg repo? 

If really so, it is a major drawback.

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Drew DeVault wrote:
> On Thu Oct 3, 2019 at 10:52 AM Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > Where else in the *.sr.ht interface do you already have dropdowns? The
> > *.sr.ht interfaces look geeky (which I personally like very much) and I
> > somehow cannot quite envision a dropdown menu.
> 
> We have something similar in the mailing list archives with the
> 'details' thing. 

I see what you mean. Looks nice, I must admit.

> I'd just like to explore it, let's put together a patch
> with a dropdown and if it's not good, then we won't do it, but we can't
> know until we try.

Drew DeVault wrote:
> On Wed Oct 2, 2019 at 11:08 PM Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > I still really *do* wish to see a direct link to my hg repos. I don't use git. Is
> > there really no way?
> 
> The plan is to make the git/hg link a dropdown. Patches welcome, I still
> hvaen't gotten around to it.

I suggest we should not go the difficult way. It would be nice and
enough to show the hg link to those users who have at least one
hg repository. Nothing more complicated is necessary.


--

Drew DeVault wrote:
> On Wed Oct 2, 2019 at 11:08 PM Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > I still really *do* wish to see a direct link to my hg repos. I don't use git. Is
> > there really no way?
> 
> The plan is to make the git/hg link a dropdown. Patches welcome, I still
> hvaen't gotten around to it.

Where else in the *.sr.ht interface do you already have dropdowns? The
*.sr.ht interfaces look geeky (which I personally like very much) and I
somehow cannot quite envision a dropdown menu.

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN

Victor Sudakov wrote:
> 
> When I visit https://meta.sr.ht/profile and similar pages, there is a
> link to "git" (alongside with "lists", "man" etc) but no link to "hg". Why is that?
> 

I still really *do* wish to see a direct link to my hg repos. I don't use git. Is
there really no way?

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Lugubris wrote:
> 
> >> The easiest way at the moment is to set up a double remote:
> >>
> >> git clone git@git.sr.ht:... foobar
> >> cd foobar
> >> git remote set-url --add origin git@github.com:...
> >>
> >> Then when you `git push`, it'll push to both.
> >
> > Wow! Can mercurial also specify a double remote (a double default-push, that is)?
> 
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3262782/how-to-sync-two-or-more-mercurial-servers

Drew DeVault wrote:
> The easiest way at the moment is to set up a double remote:
> 
> git clone git@git.sr.ht:... foobar
> cd foobar
> git remote set-url --add origin git@github.com:...
> 
> Then when you `git push`, it'll push to both.

Wow! Can mercurial also specify a double remote (a double default-push, that is)?

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/

Uwe Brauer wrote:
>    >> 
>    >> > Is it possible to switch on keyword expansion in the hg.sr.ht Web
>    >> > interface?
>    >> 
>    >> I doubt it -- the extension is marked as a "feature of last resort" and,
>    >> actually, I had never heard of it until just now :)
> 
>    > I, on the contrary, have been addicted to this feature since RCS/CVS
>    > times, for 20+ years. It is very convenient IMHO to have the file
>    > version, last modification date etc updated for you automatically.
> 
>    > Moreover, when I maintained the tomsk.ru geographical domain, I found it
>    > convenient to have even the $Log$ copied to zone files.