Hi Jelle,
> I recently stumbled upon your website, it is very inspiring to read.
Thanks :D
> If I can offer a bit of constructive criticism, it seems you have most
> content on your website licensed under this license at [0].
>
> For the article at [1], I got reminded of ambrevar's amazing blog
> article at [2], which is licensed under the license at [3].
>
> Since I assume one of you has been inspired by the other, one of you
> both might want to change licenses for that specific blog post, as your
> version prohibits commercial purposes, whereas ambrevar's prohibits such
> prohibitions.
Ah ! That's not my only source of inspiration but indeed it was inspired
by this blogpost and others. I am no license experts, but you might be
right — at least by quickly reading the two license.
That said, I am not fully sure if there is any problem because my
blogpost is not a modification of his, it's written by me, inspired by
his and other.
In any case, it make me wonder why I choose cc by-nc-sa and not by-sa… I
don't see reason, so I am probably gonna switch my CC license to the
same as ambrevar anyway 😛.
> Apologies for the noise in case I got it the wrong way around, and keep
> up the writing :-).
No worries ;) Most of the time, noise is better than silence :D
Cheers,
--
Vincent Demeester
vincent@sbr.pm | @vdemeest